PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATXS vs. CRDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATXS vs. CRDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astria Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXS) and Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATXS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRDF

1D
-7.28%
1M
-15.15%
YTD
-50.18%
6M
-34.27%
1Y
-60.11%
3Y*
-4.94%
5Y*
-28.67%
10Y*
-42.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATXS vs. CRDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATXS
Astria Therapeutics, Inc.
-3.90%46.42%16.41%-48.42%176.25%-58.02%-63.79%35.24%-70.67%-58.73%
CRDF
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.
-50.18%-35.25%193.24%5.71%-76.71%-66.59%1,350.81%-60.67%-85.76%-85.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ATXS and CRDF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATXS:

$729.71M

CRDF:

$95.69M

EPS

ATXS:

-$2.14

CRDF:

-$0.67

PS Ratio

ATXS:

1.03K

CRDF:

194.23

PB Ratio

ATXS:

5.29

CRDF:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATXS:

$706.00K

CRDF:

$484.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATXS:

$706.00K

CRDF:

-$11.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATXS:

-$134.05M

CRDF:

-$45.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Astria Therapeutics, Inc.

Cardiff Oncology, Inc.

Often compared with ATXS:
ATXS vs. VOO
Often compared with CRDF:
CRDF vs. VSTMCRDF vs. BEAT

Return for Risk

ATXS vs. CRDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATXS

CRDF
CRDF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATXS vs. CRDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astria Therapeutics, Inc. (ATXS) and Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATXS vs. CRDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATXSCRDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

Drawdowns

ATXS vs. CRDF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATXSCRDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.84%

Volatility

ATXS vs. CRDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATXSCRDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.66%

Dividends

ATXS vs. CRDF - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATXS nor CRDF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ATXS vs. CRDF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astria Therapeutics, Inc. and Cardiff Oncology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00K400.00K600.00K800.00K20222023202420252026
706.00K
0
(ATXS) Total Revenue
(CRDF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ATXS and CRDF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATXS and CRDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer