PortfoliosLab logo
ATUS vs. IAG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ATUS and IAG is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ATUS vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATUS:

-0.23

IAG:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

ATUS:

0.16

IAG:

2.11

Omega Ratio

ATUS:

1.02

IAG:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

ATUS:

-0.14

IAG:

1.04

Martin Ratio

ATUS:

-0.69

IAG:

8.47

Ulcer Index

ATUS:

19.37%

IAG:

10.29%

Daily Std Dev

ATUS:

65.71%

IAG:

59.41%

Max Drawdown

ATUS:

-95.86%

IAG:

-95.55%

Current Drawdown

ATUS:

-94.04%

IAG:

-65.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATUS:

$1.04B

IAG:

$4.34B

EPS

ATUS:

-$0.33

IAG:

$1.46

PEG Ratio

ATUS:

0.17

IAG:

31.67

PS Ratio

ATUS:

0.12

IAG:

2.45

PB Ratio

ATUS:

28.76

IAG:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATUS:

$8.86B

IAG:

$1.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATUS:

$6.03B

IAG:

$581.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATUS:

$2.44B

IAG:

$1.22B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATUS achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 45.74% return.


ATUS

YTD

-6.22%

1M

-8.50%

6M

-10.67%

1Y

-14.72%

3Y*

-40.46%

5Y*

-38.62%

10Y*

N/A

IAG

YTD

45.74%

1M

11.90%

6M

31.47%

1Y

95.32%

3Y*

48.42%

5Y*

15.81%

10Y*

13.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Altice USA, Inc.

IAMGOLD Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATUS vs. IAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATUS is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATUS is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATUS is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATUS is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATUS is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATUS is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAG is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAG is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAG is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAG is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAG is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATUS vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ATUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATUS and IAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ATUS vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATUS nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
ATUS
Altice USA, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.64%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ATUS vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATUS drawdown since its inception was -95.86%, roughly equal to the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATUS and IAG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ATUS vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 18.88%. This indicates that ATUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ATUS vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altice USA, Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.15B
477.10M
(ATUS) Total Revenue
(IAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATUS vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Altice USA, Inc. and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
68.9%
29.6%
(ATUS) Gross Margin
(IAG) Gross Margin
ATUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Altice USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 2.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.20M and revenue of 477.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.

ATUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Altice USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 343.46M and revenue of 2.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 113.10M and revenue of 477.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

ATUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Altice USA, Inc. reported a net income of -75.68M and revenue of 2.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.5%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 39.70M and revenue of 477.10M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.