ATRFX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
ATRFX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 31, 2014. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | -17.98% | 2.81% | -4.14% | 24.60% | -4.33% | 25.70% | 15.32% | 29.25% | -19.65% | 0.94% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATRFX achieves a -17.98% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
ATRFX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -17.24%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -15.82%
- 1Y
- -6.37%
- 3Y*
- -2.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.86%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATRFX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATRFX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
ATRFX
SWLGX
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATRFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | 0.66 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 1.10 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.72 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 2.51 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATRFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 0.66 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.56 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.68 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATRFX and SWLGX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
ATRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | 0.80% | 0.65% | 11.89% | 1.87% | 4.98% | 5.43% | 20.92% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 1.02% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATRFX drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRFX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATRFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -32.69% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -16.16% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | -32.69% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.04% | -16.16% | -13.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -7.13% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 4.62% | +1.64% |
Volatility
ATRFX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that ATRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATRFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 5.38% | +6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.58% | 11.82% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 22.31% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 21.47% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 22.78% | -7.43% |