PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATR vs. BWA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATR vs. BWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) and BorgWarner Inc. (BWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATR achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than BWA's 42.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ATR has underperformed BWA with an annualized return of 7.16%, while BWA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


ATR

1D
0.07%
1M
5.87%
6M
8.43%
YTD
11.09%
1Y
-3.79%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
7.16%
ALL TIME*
11.95%

BWA

1D
-1.04%
1M
0.35%
6M
35.16%
YTD
42.21%
1Y
72.15%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$64.95M$62.80M$62.73M
$127.54M$141.73M$209.78M

ATR vs. BWA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
11.09%-21.40%28.60%13.89%-8.93%-9.54%19.87%24.47%10.55%19.32%
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
42.21%43.88%-10.15%2.50%-9.18%18.39%-9.19%27.13%-30.97%31.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ATR and BWA is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 1993

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between ATR and BWA has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATR:

$8.55B

BWA:

$13.07B

EPS

ATR:

$5.54

BWA:

$1.70

PE Ratio

ATR:

24.18

BWA:

37.43

PS Ratio

ATR:

2.23

BWA:

0.95

PB Ratio

ATR:

311.70

BWA:

2.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATR:

$3.93B

BWA:

$14.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATR:

$549.49M

BWA:

$2.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATR:

$758.80M

BWA:

$1.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATR vs. BWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATR
ATR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ATR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ATR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATR Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BWA
BWA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATR vs. BWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) and BorgWarner Inc. (BWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATRBWADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.36

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

3.19

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

7.35

-8.44

ATR vs. BWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATR Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the BWA Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATR and BWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATR vs. BWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATR drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, smaller than the maximum BWA drawdown of -72.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATR and BWA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATRBWADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.39%

-72.15%

+27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.88%

-23.80%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.16%

-40.24%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.16%

-45.88%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.78%

-64.59%

+24.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.13%

-17.25%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-21.99%

+11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.05%

10.31%

+8.74%

Volatility

ATR vs. BWA - Volatility Comparison

AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) and BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) have volatilities of 8.26% and 8.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATRBWADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

8.18%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.23%

34.06%

-13.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

40.05%

-13.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.60%

34.36%

-11.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

34.62%

-12.43%

Dividends

ATR vs. BWA - Dividend Comparison

ATR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than BWA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
1.43%1.50%1.09%1.28%1.38%1.22%1.05%1.23%1.40%1.48%1.66%1.57%
BWA
BorgWarner Inc.
1.07%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.69%1.51%1.76%1.57%1.96%1.15%1.34%1.20%

Financials

ATR vs. BWA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AptarGroup, Inc. and BorgWarner Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ATR vs. BWA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AptarGroup, Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ATR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AptarGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of -276.18M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -26.9%.

BWA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported a gross profit of 677.00M and revenue of 3.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.2%.

ATR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AptarGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 125.59M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

BWA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported an operating income of 336.00M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

ATR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AptarGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 87.57M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.

BWA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BorgWarner Inc. reported a net income of 242.00M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATR and BWA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATR has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to BWA (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATR dropped -44.39% vs BWA's -72.15%.

BWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATR and BWA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer