ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 13.31%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.
ATO
29.64%
3.52%
27.31%
35.60%
9.16%
13.31%
PG
19.52%
0.80%
3.05%
17.07%
9.99%
9.85%
Fundamentals
| ATO | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.88B | $402.45B |
| EPS | $6.85 | $5.81 |
| PE Ratio | 21.49 | 29.41 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.50 | 3.60 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.51B | $83.91B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.64B | $43.14B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.72B | $22.14B |
Key characteristics
| ATO | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.35 | 1.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.50 | 1.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.08 | 5.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.60% | 2.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.66% | 15.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.94% | -54.23% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -3.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than PG's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.19% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 3.13% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.32% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 4.35%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities