ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Key characteristics
| ATO | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.45% | 13.24% |
| 1Y Return | 8.32% | 7.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.44% | 9.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.51% | 11.85% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.57% | 10.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.83% | 14.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.94% | -54.23% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.32% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| ATO | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.64B | $380.67B |
| EPS | $6.26 | $6.11 |
| PE Ratio | 18.68 | 26.40 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.74 | 3.28 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.95B | $84.06B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.06B | $39.25B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.78B | $24.22B |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 11.57%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than PG's 2.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.60% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 3.13% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 2.60%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities