ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATO:
1.50
PG:
1.24
ATO:
2.15
PG:
1.77
ATO:
1.27
PG:
1.24
ATO:
2.27
PG:
2.09
ATO:
7.57
PG:
7.20
ATO:
2.98%
PG:
2.58%
ATO:
15.04%
PG:
14.98%
ATO:
-51.94%
PG:
-54.23%
ATO:
-9.92%
PG:
-5.91%
Fundamentals
ATO:
$21.97B
PG:
$401.13B
ATO:
$6.83
PG:
$5.80
ATO:
20.70
PG:
29.37
ATO:
3.36
PG:
3.60
ATO:
$4.17B
PG:
$83.91B
ATO:
$2.08B
PG:
$43.14B
ATO:
$2.09B
PG:
$22.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 18.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.36%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.32% annualized return.
ATO
20.82%
-6.64%
18.00%
21.61%
6.66%
12.36%
PG
18.25%
-0.98%
1.50%
18.55%
8.85%
9.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than PG's 2.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.41% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% | 3.13% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.60%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities