ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATO:
1.76
PG:
0.22
ATO:
2.39
PG:
0.41
ATO:
1.32
PG:
1.06
ATO:
2.98
PG:
0.34
ATO:
8.07
PG:
0.90
ATO:
3.66%
PG:
4.43%
ATO:
16.76%
PG:
17.72%
ATO:
-51.94%
PG:
-54.23%
ATO:
-5.43%
PG:
-11.32%
Fundamentals
ATO:
$23.46B
PG:
$375.72B
ATO:
$6.98
PG:
$6.29
ATO:
21.18
PG:
25.47
ATO:
2.44
PG:
3.27
ATO:
$2.54B
PG:
$64.15B
ATO:
$1.50B
PG:
$32.96B
ATO:
$1.45B
PG:
$17.75B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than PG's -4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.97%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.
ATO
6.06%
-1.18%
7.48%
29.42%
9.70%
12.97%
PG
-4.95%
-9.98%
-4.68%
4.01%
9.38%
9.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATO
PG
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than PG's 2.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.28% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.54% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 6.82%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities