PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATO vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ATOPG
YTD Return9.08%17.11%
1Y Return7.37%16.42%
3Y Return (Ann)10.05%9.15%
5Y Return (Ann)5.66%10.67%
10Y Return (Ann)12.02%10.77%
Sharpe Ratio0.431.21
Daily Std Dev16.35%13.74%
Max Drawdown-51.94%-54.23%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Fundamentals


ATOPG
Market Cap$18.46B$399.90B
EPS$6.63$6.12
PE Ratio18.4527.69
PEG Ratio2.743.28
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.39B$63.51B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.71B$33.01B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.63B$18.51B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 17.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.02%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


8,000.00%9,000.00%10,000.00%11,000.00%12,000.00%13,000.00%14,000.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
9,186.30%
13,604.30%
ATO
PG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Atmos Energy Corporation

The Procter & Gamble Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.00
PG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PG, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PG, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.004.83

ATO vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ATO and PG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
0.43
1.21
ATO
PG

Dividends

ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than PG's 2.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.53%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%2.69%3.13%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.26%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%2.78%2.91%

Drawdowns

ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly00
ATO
PG

Volatility

ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 3.88%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
4.68%
3.88%
ATO
PG

Financials

ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items