ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATO:
2.04
PG:
0.62
ATO:
2.89
PG:
0.92
ATO:
1.37
PG:
1.12
ATO:
3.17
PG:
0.80
ATO:
8.93
PG:
2.42
ATO:
3.52%
PG:
3.87%
ATO:
15.44%
PG:
15.27%
ATO:
-51.94%
PG:
-54.23%
ATO:
-5.49%
PG:
-5.45%
Fundamentals
ATO:
$22.72B
PG:
$396.00B
ATO:
$6.98
PG:
$6.29
ATO:
20.50
PG:
26.85
ATO:
2.40
PG:
3.59
ATO:
$4.18B
PG:
$84.35B
ATO:
$2.60B
PG:
$43.30B
ATO:
$2.18B
PG:
$23.29B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.88%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.
ATO
2.76%
4.75%
14.10%
31.26%
6.69%
12.88%
PG
1.35%
5.34%
0.02%
8.75%
8.70%
10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATO
PG
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than PG's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.30% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.51%. This indicates that ATO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities