ATO vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between ATO and PG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ATO:
1.97
PG:
-0.12
ATO:
2.61
PG:
-0.08
ATO:
1.35
PG:
0.99
ATO:
3.35
PG:
-0.25
ATO:
9.40
PG:
-0.57
ATO:
3.53%
PG:
5.22%
ATO:
16.96%
PG:
19.01%
ATO:
-51.94%
PG:
-54.23%
ATO:
-6.40%
PG:
-10.96%
Fundamentals
ATO:
$24.39B
PG:
$372.15B
ATO:
$7.16
PG:
$6.31
ATO:
21.46
PG:
25.16
ATO:
2.57
PG:
3.90
ATO:
5.44
PG:
4.43
ATO:
1.86
PG:
7.33
ATO:
$4.49B
PG:
$83.93B
ATO:
$2.44B
PG:
$43.05B
ATO:
$1.45B
PG:
$23.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than PG's -4.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 13.70%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.
ATO
9.96%
-1.76%
5.13%
33.13%
12.75%
13.70%
PG
-4.56%
-5.97%
-3.95%
-2.32%
9.34%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATO
PG
ATO vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ATO vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than PG's 2.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO Atmos Energy Corporation | 2.20% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.46% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 2.52% | 2.69% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.58% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ATO vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ATO vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 4.76%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ATO vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATO vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
ATO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 937.97M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 19.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
ATO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 628.94M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.2%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.56B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
ATO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 485.58M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.