ATMP vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
ATMP and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both ATMP and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATMP or DGRO.
Key characteristics
| ATMP | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.34% | 20.38% |
| 1Y Return | 40.11% | 31.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 25.79% | 8.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.52% | 12.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.16% | 12.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.08 | 3.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.18 | 4.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.06 | 4.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.92 | 21.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.05% | 1.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.28% | 9.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.92% | -35.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.02% | -0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and DGRO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ATMP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 36.34% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 20.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 6.16%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATMP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATMP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DGRO's 2.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.59% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% | 2.89% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATMP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.29%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.