ATMP vs. DGRO
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 5.16%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DGRO. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ATMP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 5.16%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.84%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $521.25K | $462.49K | $511.48K | |
| $103.52M | $104.25M | $110.17M |
ATMP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 26.22% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.39% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and DGRO is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ATMP and DGRO has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
DGRO
ATMP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.61 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 14.07 | -7.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -35.10% | -45.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -6.47% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -14.03% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -19.31% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -35.10% | -40.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.35% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.81% | -3.41% | -27.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.66% | +1.88% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.21%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 3.21% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 7.12% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 9.61% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 13.79% | +8.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 16.58% | +11.04% |
ATMP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and DGRO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to DGRO (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.44% vs 5.16% for ATMP. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer