ATFV vs. QUAL
ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATFV returned 15.56%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for QUAL. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATFV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUAL.
Performance
ATFV vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's 8.80% return.
ATFV
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 48.62%
- 3Y*
- 39.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
ATFV vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATFV Alger 35 ETF | 16.46% | 38.20% | 46.14% | 32.75% | -35.97% | 4.19% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 8.80% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 15.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATFV and QUAL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ATFV and QUAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ATFV vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ATFV
QUAL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ATFV
QUAL
Communication Services
ATFV
QUAL
Consumer Cyclical
ATFV
QUAL
Healthcare
ATFV
QUAL
Industrials
ATFV
QUAL
Utilities
ATFV
QUAL
Financial Services
ATFV
QUAL
Basic Materials
ATFV
-
QUAL
Consumer Defensive
ATFV
-
QUAL
Energy
ATFV
-
QUAL
Real Estate
ATFV
-
QUAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATFV vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank
ATFV
QUAL
ATFV vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATFV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.41 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 11.00 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATFV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.84 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.69 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
ATFV vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than QUAL's maximum drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and QUAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATFV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.34% | -34.06% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -9.03% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.01% | -18.00% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.34% | -28.23% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -0.16% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -4.11% | -13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 1.98% | +3.35% |
Volatility
ATFV vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 2.51%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATFV | QUAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 2.51% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.34% | 9.03% | +8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 11.83% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 17.33% | +9.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.55% | 18.10% | +8.45% |
ATFV vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATFV vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison
ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than QUAL's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATFV Alger 35 ETF | 0.17% | 0.20% | 0.16% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATFV and QUAL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATFV has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs QUAL's -34.06%.
On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 15.56% vs 11.96% for QUAL. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.
QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.17% for ATFV.
ATFV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QUAL is Large Cap Blend Equities. ATFV tracks S&P 500, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.15% for QUAL.
ATFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATFV and QUAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer