PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATFV vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATFV vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's 8.80% return.


ATFV

1D
-2.00%
1M
8.35%
YTD
16.46%
6M
16.04%
1Y
48.62%
3Y*
39.26%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*

QUAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.62%
YTD
8.80%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
16.46%38.20%46.14%32.75%-35.97%4.19%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
8.80%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and QUAL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.79

The correlation between ATFV and QUAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ATFV vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ATFV
QUAL

Technology

42.1%
36.5%

Communication Services

25.8%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Industrials

8.2%
8.2%

Utilities

2.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

2.5%
11.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

4.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

ATFV
42.1%
QUAL
36.5%

Communication Services

ATFV
25.8%
QUAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ATFV
10.2%
QUAL
9.3%

Healthcare

ATFV
8.6%
QUAL
9.0%

Industrials

ATFV
8.2%
QUAL
8.2%

Utilities

ATFV
2.7%
QUAL
1.9%

Financial Services

ATFV
2.5%
QUAL
11.5%

Basic Materials

ATFV

-

QUAL
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

ATFV

-

QUAL
4.9%

Energy

ATFV

-

QUAL
4.0%

Real Estate

ATFV

-

QUAL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATFV vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV
ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATFVQUALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.41

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

11.00

-1.85

ATFV vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATFVQUALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.84

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.69

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.80

-0.21

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than QUAL's maximum drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and QUAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATFVQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.34%

-34.06%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

-9.03%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.01%

-18.00%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.34%

-28.23%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-0.16%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-4.11%

-13.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

1.98%

+3.35%

Volatility

ATFV vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 2.51%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATFVQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

2.51%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

9.03%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

11.83%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

17.33%

+9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.55%

18.10%

+8.45%

ATFV vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATFV vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than QUAL's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
0.17%0.20%0.16%0.01%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATFV and QUAL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATFV has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 15.56% vs 11.96% for QUAL. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.17% for ATFV.

ATFV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QUAL is Large Cap Blend Equities. ATFV tracks S&P 500, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.15% for QUAL.

ATFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATFV and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer