ATER vs. LAUR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ATER (Aterian, Inc.) and LAUR (Laureate Education, Inc.) are both stocks. ATER operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while LAUR operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, ATER returned -61.74%/yr vs 44.45%/yr for LAUR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATER vs. LAUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATER achieves a 71.10% return, which is significantly higher than LAUR's 19.13% return.

ATER

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -0.83%
• 6M: 46.19%
• YTD: 71.10%
• 1Y: -17.93%
• 3Y*: -44.53%
• 5Y*: -61.74%
• 10Y*: —

LAUR

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 9.11%
• 6M: 12.76%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 1Y: 70.17%
• 3Y*: 50.38%
• 5Y*: 44.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATER vs. LAUR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATER Aterian, Inc.	71.10%	-71.02%	-42.61%	-54.76%	-81.26%	-76.12%	192.19%	-41.10%
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc.	19.13%	84.09%	33.41%	50.20%	-4.08%	49.50%	-17.32%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ATER and LAUR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATER : $12.87M LAUR : $5.61B
EPS ATER : -$2.55 LAUR : $2.83
PS Ratio ATER : 0.18 LAUR : 2.28
Total Revenue (TTM) ATER : $53.63M LAUR : $1.74B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATER : $29.74M LAUR : $484.38M
EBITDA (TTM) ATER : -$10.81M LAUR : $491.66M

Return for Risk

ATER vs. LAUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATER

ATER Risk / Return Rank: 40
ATER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ATER Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ATER Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ATER Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ATER Martin Ratio Rank: 37

LAUR

LAUR Risk / Return Rank: 92
LAUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LAUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LAUR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LAUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LAUR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATER vs. LAUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATER	LAUR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	2.17	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.69	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.38	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	4.32	-4.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	12.84	-13.31

ATER vs. LAUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATER Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the LAUR Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATER and LAUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATER vs. LAUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATER drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than LAUR's maximum drawdown of -64.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATER and LAUR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATER	LAUR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.91%	-64.52%	-35.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.94%	-16.33%	-44.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.94%	-16.33%	-76.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.75%	-25.33%	-74.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.79%	-0.87%	-98.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.34%	-14.82%	-64.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.87%	5.48%	+34.39%

Volatility

ATER vs. LAUR - Volatility Comparison

Aterian, Inc. (ATER) has a higher volatility of 27.26% compared to Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) at 9.49%. This indicates that ATER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATER	LAUR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.26%	9.49%	+17.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.85%	23.90%	+52.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.70%	32.63%	+72.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.80%	33.42%	+78.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.27%	40.05%	+69.22%

Dividends

ATER vs. LAUR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATER nor LAUR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATER Aterian, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.11%	22.77%	62.01%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATER and LAUR in my portfolio?

ATER and LAUR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATER or LAUR?

ATER has higher volatility (27.26%) compared to LAUR (9.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATER dropped -99.91% vs LAUR's -64.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.