ATEN vs. CLS
Compare and contrast key facts about A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATEN or CLS.
Correlation
The correlation between ATEN and CLS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ATEN vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ATEN:
0.36
CLS:
1.24
ATEN:
0.66
CLS:
1.80
ATEN:
1.10
CLS:
1.25
ATEN:
0.36
CLS:
1.75
ATEN:
0.84
CLS:
4.41
ATEN:
14.71%
CLS:
21.40%
ATEN:
34.35%
CLS:
75.25%
ATEN:
-78.28%
CLS:
-96.93%
ATEN:
-20.74%
CLS:
-35.23%
Fundamentals
ATEN:
$1.24B
CLS:
$10.76B
ATEN:
$0.67
CLS:
$3.58
ATEN:
25.61
CLS:
25.99
ATEN:
-10.86
CLS:
19.42
ATEN:
4.63
CLS:
1.07
ATEN:
6.22
CLS:
7.12
ATEN:
$267.16M
CLS:
$10.09B
ATEN:
$213.74M
CLS:
$1.07B
ATEN:
$51.39M
CLS:
$724.86M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a -6.48% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEN has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 12.71%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.
ATEN
-6.48%
10.00%
6.61%
12.23%
20.52%
12.71%
CLS
0.81%
21.67%
8.39%
91.82%
75.37%
22.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATEN vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATEN
CLS
ATEN vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ATEN vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 1.26% | 0.30% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATEN vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.28%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ATEN vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) is 7.92%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that ATEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ATEN vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A10 Networks, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATEN vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
ATEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.70M and revenue of 66.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.
ATEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.78M and revenue of 66.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
ATEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 9.54M and revenue of 66.14M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.