ATEN vs. CLS
Compare and contrast key facts about A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATEN or CLS.
Correlation
The correlation between ATEN and CLS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATEN vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATEN:
1.65
CLS:
2.34
ATEN:
2.46
CLS:
2.53
ATEN:
1.33
CLS:
1.37
ATEN:
1.62
CLS:
2.95
ATEN:
4.85
CLS:
12.80
ATEN:
11.45%
CLS:
12.04%
ATEN:
33.78%
CLS:
65.90%
ATEN:
-78.28%
CLS:
-96.93%
ATEN:
-7.07%
CLS:
-26.14%
Fundamentals
ATEN:
$1.48B
CLS:
$12.36B
ATEN:
$0.67
CLS:
$3.61
ATEN:
30.03
CLS:
29.39
ATEN:
-10.86
CLS:
19.42
ATEN:
$261.70M
CLS:
$9.64B
ATEN:
$210.28M
CLS:
$1.02B
ATEN:
$49.48M
CLS:
$755.36M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATEN achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 14.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEN has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 17.28%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.66% annualized return.
ATEN
9.65%
4.70%
49.33%
51.84%
26.55%
17.28%
CLS
14.96%
-12.80%
110.83%
154.09%
74.66%
24.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATEN vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATEN
CLS
ATEN vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATEN vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 1.26% | 0.30% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATEN vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATEN drawdown since its inception was -78.28%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEN and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATEN vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) is 9.41%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 43.09%. This indicates that ATEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATEN vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between A10 Networks, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities