PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEC vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATEC vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEC achieves a -64.45% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEC has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 11.74%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.


ATEC

1D
0.00%
1M
-28.28%
YTD
-64.45%
6M
-64.67%
1Y
-39.19%
3Y*
-21.32%
5Y*
-11.81%
10Y*
11.74%

XMMO

1D
2.16%
1M
6.07%
YTD
22.96%
6M
24.84%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
31.83%
5Y*
16.81%
10Y*
19.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEC vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
-64.45%129.19%-39.25%22.35%8.05%-21.28%104.65%209.83%-13.91%-17.13%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.96%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEC and XMMO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2006

0.31

The correlation between ATEC and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEC vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEC
ATEC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ATEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEC vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATECXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

2.01

-2.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.49

2.80

-3.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.35

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

4.53

-5.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.26

18.56

-19.82

ATEC vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEC and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATECXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.01

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.79

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.89

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.57

-0.75

Drawdowns

ATEC vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEC drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEC and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATECXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.90%

-55.37%

-43.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.18%

-8.34%

-60.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.51%

-24.93%

-48.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.51%

-27.91%

-45.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.34%

-36.74%

-50.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.06%

0.00%

-93.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.44%

-9.45%

-70.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.57%

2.04%

+29.53%

Volatility

ATEC vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) has a higher volatility of 42.80% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that ATEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATECXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.80%

7.82%

+34.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.18%

15.59%

+43.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.82%

18.71%

+51.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.07%

21.45%

+41.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.18%

22.27%

+46.91%

Dividends

ATEC vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

ATEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATEC and XMMO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEC has higher volatility (42.80%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEC dropped -98.90% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEC and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer