PortfoliosLab logo
ATEC vs. PHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ATEC and PHM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ATEC vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATEC:

0.31

PHM:

-0.43

Sortino Ratio

ATEC:

0.96

PHM:

-0.34

Omega Ratio

ATEC:

1.14

PHM:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

ATEC:

0.22

PHM:

-0.34

Martin Ratio

ATEC:

0.73

PHM:

-0.62

Ulcer Index

ATEC:

28.71%

PHM:

20.53%

Daily Std Dev

ATEC:

74.86%

PHM:

34.20%

Max Drawdown

ATEC:

-98.90%

PHM:

-92.40%

Current Drawdown

ATEC:

-88.47%

PHM:

-33.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATEC:

$1.82B

PHM:

$19.75B

EPS

ATEC:

-$1.14

PHM:

$14.09

PEG Ratio

ATEC:

0.00

PHM:

0.29

PS Ratio

ATEC:

2.83

PHM:

1.10

PB Ratio

ATEC:

50.98

PHM:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATEC:

$642.27M

PHM:

$17.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATEC:

$423.03M

PHM:

$5.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATEC:

-$73.86M

PHM:

$3.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEC achieves a 35.40% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ATEC has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of -2.76%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.23% annualized return.


ATEC

YTD

35.40%

1M

13.21%

6M

18.61%

1Y

22.70%

3Y*

17.41%

5Y*

22.81%

10Y*

-2.76%

PHM

YTD

-9.79%

1M

-4.44%

6M

-27.24%

1Y

-14.71%

3Y*

30.63%

5Y*

24.91%

10Y*

19.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

PulteGroup, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATEC vs. PHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATEC is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATEC is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATEC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATEC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATEC is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATEC is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHM is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHM is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHM is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHM is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHM is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHM is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATEC vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ATEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the PHM Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEC and PHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ATEC vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

ATEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.86%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%1.07%

Drawdowns

ATEC vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEC drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than PHM's maximum drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEC and PHM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ATEC vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) at 9.14%. This indicates that ATEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ATEC vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphatec Holdings, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
169.18M
3.89B
(ATEC) Total Revenue
(PHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATEC vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphatec Holdings, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
68.6%
30.2%
(ATEC) Gross Margin
(PHM) Gross Margin
ATEC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphatec Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.00M and revenue of 169.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.

PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

ATEC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphatec Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -44.29M and revenue of 169.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -26.2%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 780.20M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

ATEC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alphatec Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -51.91M and revenue of 169.18M, resulting in a net margin of -30.7%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 522.80M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.