ATEC vs. MEDP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP).

Performance

ATEC vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATEC vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATEC Alphatec Holdings, Inc.	-48.29%	129.19%	-39.25%	22.35%	8.05%	-21.28%	104.65%	209.83%	-13.91%	-17.13%
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	-14.50%	69.05%	8.38%	44.31%	-2.40%	56.35%	65.60%	58.81%	45.97%	0.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATEC : $1.63B MEDP : $13.91B
EPS ATEC : -$0.95 MEDP : $15.23
PS Ratio ATEC : 2.97 MEDP : 5.62
PB Ratio ATEC : 7.05 MEDP : 30.30
Total Revenue (TTM) ATEC : $551.23M MEDP : $2.53B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATEC : $531.89M MEDP : $760.62M
EBITDA (TTM) ATEC : -$56.71M MEDP : $541.22M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEC achieves a -48.29% return, which is significantly lower than MEDP's -14.50% return.

ATEC

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -20.12%
• YTD: -48.29%
• 6M: -25.17%
• 1Y: 7.30%
• 3Y*: -11.32%
• 5Y*: -6.94%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

MEDP

• 1D: 4.32%
• 1M: 6.29%
• YTD: -14.50%
• 6M: -6.61%
• 1Y: 57.60%
• 3Y*: 36.68%
• 5Y*: 23.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATEC vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEC

ATEC Risk / Return Rank: 46
ATEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ATEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ATEC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ATEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ATEC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

MEDP

MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 77
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEC vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATEC	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	0.85	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.18	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.30	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	1.63	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	4.82	-4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATEC vs. MEDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the MEDP Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEC and MEDP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATEC	MEDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	0.85	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	0.46	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.70	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ATEC and MEDP is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATEC vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATEC nor MEDP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ATEC vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEC drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEC and MEDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATEC	MEDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.90%	-42.87%	-56.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.03%	-32.96%	-19.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.51%	-42.87%	-30.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.90%	-22.62%	-67.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.35%	-12.64%	-67.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.38%	11.14%	+9.24%

Volatility

ATEC vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) at 11.00%. This indicates that ATEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATEC	MEDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.15%	11.00%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.68%	29.67%	+12.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.89%	67.80%	-9.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.62%	50.92%	+9.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.38%	49.58%	+18.80%

Financials