PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATDRY vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATDRY vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATDRY achieves a -20.73% return, which is significantly lower than COCO's 39.77% return.


ATDRY

1D
2.70%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
-20.73%
6M
-22.73%
1Y
-42.18%
3Y*
-5.31%
5Y*
-4.06%
10Y*
1.55%

COCO

1D
0.15%
1M
7.94%
YTD
39.77%
6M
35.78%
1Y
117.27%
3Y*
40.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATDRY vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATDRY
Auto Trader Group PLC ADR
-20.73%-20.14%9.71%52.87%-39.68%20.48%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
39.77%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ATDRY and COCO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATDRY:

$5.16B

COCO:

$4.48B

EPS

ATDRY:

$0.17

COCO:

$1.38

PE Ratio

ATDRY:

9.07

COCO:

53.70

PEG Ratio

ATDRY:

1.42

COCO:

0.45

PS Ratio

ATDRY:

4.27

COCO:

6.76

PB Ratio

ATDRY:

12.67

COCO:

12.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATDRY:

$1.23B

COCO:

$658.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATDRY:

$948.24M

COCO:

$246.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATDRY:

$804.25M

COCO:

$100.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATDRY vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATDRY
ATDRY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ATDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ATDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATDRY vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATDRYCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

1.40

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

5.08

-5.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

14.24

-15.72

ATDRY vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATDRY Sharpe Ratio is -1.50, which is lower than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATDRY and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATDRYCOCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.50

2.27

-3.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.79

-0.76

Drawdowns

ATDRY vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATDRY drawdown since its inception was -53.83%, smaller than the maximum COCO drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATDRY and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATDRYCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.83%

-56.97%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.40%

-23.23%

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.83%

-38.55%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.88%

-6.49%

-43.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-16.77%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.50%

8.27%

+20.23%

Volatility

ATDRY vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 10.13%. This indicates that ATDRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATDRYCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.47%

10.13%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.90%

41.37%

-18.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.29%

52.09%

-23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.79%

56.57%

-26.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.24%

56.57%

-1.33%

Dividends

ATDRY vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

ATDRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATDRY
Auto Trader Group PLC ADR
2.39%1.83%1.23%1.12%1.71%0.70%0.38%0.87%1.12%1.15%0.21%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATDRY vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Auto Trader Group PLC ADR and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
311.21M
179.77M
(ATDRY) Total Revenue
(COCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATDRY vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Auto Trader Group PLC ADR and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
76.0%
40.0%
Portfolio components
ATDRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 236.50M and revenue of 311.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.0%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

ATDRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported an operating income of 193.46M and revenue of 311.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.2%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

ATDRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported a net income of 145.15M and revenue of 311.21M, resulting in a net margin of 46.6%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATDRY and COCO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATDRY has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to COCO (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATDRY dropped -53.83% vs COCO's -56.97%.

COCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATDRY and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer