ATDRY vs. COCO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO).

Performance

ATDRY vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATDRY vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATDRY Auto Trader Group PLC ADR	-19.68%	-20.14%	9.71%	52.87%	-39.68%	20.48%
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc.	-8.34%	43.62%	43.90%	85.60%	23.72%	-17.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATDRY : $5.40B COCO : $2.93B
EPS ATDRY : $0.18 COCO : $1.19
PE Ratio ATDRY : 8.64 COCO : 40.85
PEG Ratio ATDRY : 0.28 COCO : 0.34
PS Ratio ATDRY : 4.10 COCO : 4.78
PB Ratio ATDRY : 7.11 COCO : 8.85
Total Revenue (TTM) ATDRY : $1.32B COCO : $609.78M
Gross Profit (TTM) ATDRY : $1.03B COCO : $222.60M
EBITDA (TTM) ATDRY : $872.40M COCO : $85.92M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATDRY achieves a -19.68% return, which is significantly lower than COCO's -8.34% return.

ATDRY

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -19.68%
• 6M: -39.92%
• 1Y: -35.23%
• 3Y*: -4.45%
• 5Y*: -3.32%
• 10Y*: 0.81%

COCO

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -10.76%
• YTD: -8.34%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 61.80%
• 3Y*: 35.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATDRY vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATDRY

ATDRY Risk / Return Rank: 8
ATDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ATDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ATDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ATDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ATDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

COCO

COCO Risk / Return Rank: 79
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATDRY vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATDRY	COCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.18	1.36	-2.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	1.86	-3.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.25	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	2.52	-3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	8.53	-9.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATDRY vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATDRY Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is lower than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATDRY and COCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATDRY	COCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.18	1.36	-2.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.60	-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between ATDRY and COCO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATDRY vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

ATDRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ATDRY Auto Trader Group PLC ADR	2.36%	1.83%	1.23%	1.12%	1.71%	0.70%	0.38%	0.87%	1.12%	1.15%	0.21%
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ATDRY vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATDRY drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, smaller than the maximum COCO drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATDRY and COCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATDRY	COCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.52%	-56.97%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.52%	-23.23%	-28.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.22%	-19.82%	-29.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-17.09%	-1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.00%	6.86%	+20.14%

Volatility

ATDRY vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Auto Trader Group PLC ADR (ATDRY) is 9.62%, while The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a volatility of 17.25%. This indicates that ATDRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATDRY	COCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.62%	17.25%	-7.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.68%	34.24%	-13.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.10%	45.64%	-15.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.48%	55.51%	-26.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.51%	55.51%	0.00%

Financials

ATDRY vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Auto Trader Group PLC ADR and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ATDRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 318.88M and revenue of 426.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.8%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.58M and revenue of 127.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.

ATDRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported an operating income of 265.73M and revenue of 426.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.3%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.19M and revenue of 127.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

ATDRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auto Trader Group PLC ADR reported a net income of 202.52M and revenue of 426.38M, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 5.53M and revenue of 127.79M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.