PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASTL vs. ASTLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Algoma Steel Group Inc. (ASTL) and Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant (ASTLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASTL achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than ASTLW's -60.00% return.


ASTL

1D
-5.09%
1M
-9.30%
YTD
4.63%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-36.91%
3Y*
-13.21%
5Y*
10Y*

ASTLW

1D
-13.04%
1M
7.14%
YTD
-60.00%
6M
-70.30%
1Y
-94.55%
3Y*
-71.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASTL
Algoma Steel Group Inc.
4.63%-57.40%-0.25%62.49%-39.91%-9.92%
ASTLW
Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant
-60.00%-95.00%-18.48%59.31%-59.62%-5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ASTL and ASTLW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between ASTL and ASTLW has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASTL:

$450.17M

ASTLW:

$3.15M

EPS

ASTL:

-CA$9.17

ASTLW:

-CA$9.17

PS Ratio

ASTL:

0.31

ASTLW:

0.00

PB Ratio

ASTL:

1.30

ASTLW:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASTL:

CA$2.09B

ASTLW:

CA$2.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASTL:

-CA$655.19M

ASTLW:

-CA$655.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASTL:

-CA$442.87M

ASTLW:

-CA$442.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Algoma Steel Group Inc.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant

Often compared with ASTL:
ASTL vs. UAMY

Return for Risk

ASTL vs. ASTLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASTL
ASTL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ASTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ASTLW
ASTLW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ASTLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTLW Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Algoma Steel Group Inc. (ASTL) and Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant (ASTLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASTLASTLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.94

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.99

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-1.27

+0.26

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is comparable to the ASTLW Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASTL and ASTLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTL drawdown since its inception was -73.16%, smaller than the maximum ASTLW drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTL and ASTLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASTLASTLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.16%

-99.37%

+26.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.13%

-95.83%

+40.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.88%

-98.95%

+26.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.90%

-99.24%

+35.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.45%

-68.05%

+28.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.27%

74.10%

-37.83%

Volatility

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Algoma Steel Group Inc. (ASTL) is 19.81%, while Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant (ASTLW) has a volatility of 90.67%. This indicates that ASTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASTLASTLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.81%

90.67%

-70.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.27%

154.21%

-105.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.38%

210.38%

-143.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.74%

132.72%

-80.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.74%

132.72%

-80.98%

Dividends

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASTL nor ASTLW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASTL
Algoma Steel Group Inc.
0.00%2.44%2.04%1.99%3.15%
ASTLW
Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Algoma Steel Group Inc. and Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
454.63M
454.63M
(ASTL) Total Revenue
(ASTLW) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ASTL vs. ASTLW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Algoma Steel Group Inc. and Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-84.6%
-84.6%
Portfolio components
ASTL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. reported a gross profit of -384.69M and revenue of 454.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -84.6%.

ASTLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant reported a gross profit of -384.69M and revenue of 454.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -84.6%.

ASTL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. reported an operating income of -403.57M and revenue of 454.63M, resulting in an operating margin of -88.8%.

ASTLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant reported an operating income of -403.57M and revenue of 454.63M, resulting in an operating margin of -88.8%.

ASTL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. reported a net income of -364.40M and revenue of 454.63M, resulting in a net margin of -80.2%.

ASTLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algoma Steel Group Inc. Warrant reported a net income of -364.40M and revenue of 454.63M, resulting in a net margin of -80.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASTL and ASTLW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASTLW has higher volatility (90.67%) compared to ASTL (19.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTL dropped -73.16% vs ASTLW's -99.37%.

ASTLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASTL and ASTLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer