ASPU vs. VRT
ASPU (Aspen Group, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. ASPU operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ASPU returned -44.67%/yr vs 64.12%/yr for VRT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASPU vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASPU having a 84.91% return and VRT slightly higher at 85.53%.
ASPU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 20.00%
- YTD
- 84.91%
- 6M
- 102.22%
- 1Y
- 130.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- -44.67%
- 10Y*
- -17.09%
VRT
- 1D
- -7.23%
- 1M
- -16.27%
- YTD
- 85.53%
- 6M
- 59.02%
- 1Y
- 168.11%
- 3Y*
- 147.04%
- 5Y*
- 64.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ASPU vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPU Aspen Group, Inc. | 84.91% | 4.15% | -5.00% | -45.16% | -86.86% | -78.80% | 39.12% | 45.99% | -20.58% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.53% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASPU and VRT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ASPU and VRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASPU:
$12.48M
VRT:
$117.84B
ASPU:
$0.16
VRT:
$3.99
ASPU:
2.00
VRT:
75.39
ASPU:
0.28
VRT:
10.84
ASPU:
0.37
VRT:
27.76
ASPU:
$44.62M
VRT:
$10.84B
ASPU:
$31.78M
VRT:
$3.92B
ASPU:
$10.08M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASPU vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
ASPU
VRT
ASPU vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspen Group, Inc. (ASPU) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASPU | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 6.83 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 19.20 | -15.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASPU | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.91 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 1.04 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 1.00 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
ASPU vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASPU drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASPU and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASPU | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -71.24% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.98% | -24.78% | -38.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.89% | -61.28% | -38.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -71.24% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.61% | -20.13% | -77.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.33% | -16.22% | -50.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.67% | 8.80% | +22.87% |
Volatility
ASPU vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
Aspen Group, Inc. (ASPU) has a higher volatility of 29.55% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 17.27%. This indicates that ASPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASPU | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.55% | 17.27% | +12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.70% | 45.58% | +59.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 152.60% | 58.05% | +94.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 419.68% | 61.79% | +357.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 299.96% | 54.62% | +245.34% |
Dividends
ASPU vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
ASPU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPU Aspen Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
ASPU vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aspen Group, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASPU vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
ASPU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aspen Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.68M and revenue of 10.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
ASPU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aspen Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.73M and revenue of 10.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
ASPU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aspen Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.43M and revenue of 10.39M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASPU and VRT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASPU has higher volatility (29.55%) compared to VRT (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASPU dropped -100.00% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASPU and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer