ASPN vs. META

In the year-to-date period, ASPN achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than META's 57.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ASPN has underperformed META with an annualized return of 6.78%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 22.46% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ASPN Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASPN and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ASPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

The maximum ASPN drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASPN and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.77%. This indicates that ASPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aspen Aerogels, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.