ASO vs. BOOT
ASO (Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.) and BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ASO in Specialty Retail, BOOT in Apparel Retail. Over the past 5 years, ASO returned 7.67%/yr vs 17.85%/yr for BOOT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASO vs. BOOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASO achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than BOOT's -2.60% return.
ASO
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BOOT
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 36.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 35.85%
ASO vs. BOOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASO Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | 3.13% | -12.23% | -12.18% | 26.44% | 20.55% | 111.77% | 59.58% |
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -2.60% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | 40.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASO and BOOT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2020 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ASO and BOOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASO:
$3.47B
BOOT:
$5.28B
ASO:
$5.56
BOOT:
$7.35
ASO:
9.24
BOOT:
23.39
ASO:
0.58
BOOT:
2.34
ASO:
1.60
BOOT:
4.00
ASO:
$6.05B
BOOT:
$2.25B
ASO:
$2.11B
BOOT:
$858.36M
ASO:
$512.18M
BOOT:
$358.43M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASO vs. BOOT — Risk / Return Rank
ASO
BOOT
ASO vs. BOOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASO | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.21 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 0.64 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.07 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.21 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 0.54 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASO | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.21 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.36 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.35 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
ASO vs. BOOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASO drawdown since its inception was -54.17%, smaller than the maximum BOOT drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASO and BOOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASO | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.17% | -83.73% | +29.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.42% | -35.01% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.17% | -48.93% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.17% | -60.62% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.20% | -17.35% | -12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -32.35% | +13.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 13.50% | -3.00% |
Volatility
ASO vs. BOOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) is 12.96%, while Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that ASO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASO | BOOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 15.90% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.90% | 32.56% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.44% | 42.85% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 49.78% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.92% | 57.04% | -10.12% |
Dividends
ASO vs. BOOT - Dividend Comparison
ASO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASO Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | 1.05% | 1.04% | 0.76% | 0.55% | 0.57% |
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ASO vs. BOOT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASO vs. BOOT - Profitability Comparison
ASO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 576.60M and revenue of 1.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
ASO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported an operating income of 170.15M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
ASO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported a net income of 133.69M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASO and BOOT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOOT has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to ASO (12.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASO dropped -54.17% vs BOOT's -83.73%.
ASO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASO and BOOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer