ASM vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASM or MSFT.
Key characteristics
| ASM | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 109.92% | 13.69% |
| 1Y Return | 133.55% | 15.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.57% | 9.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.41% | 24.40% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.32% | 25.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.28 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.06 | 1.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.16 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.09 | 2.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.55% | 6.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 66.23% | 19.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.10% | -69.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -71.58% | -8.90% |
Fundamentals
| ASM | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $145.91M | $3.15T |
| EPS | $0.00 | $12.12 |
| PE Ratio | 0.00 | 34.90 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.21 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $39.06M | $254.19B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $8.50M | $176.28B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.90M | $139.70B |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM and MSFT is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASM vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a 109.92% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -2.32%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASM vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASM vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
ASM vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASM vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 20.44% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 7.77%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ASM vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities