PortfoliosLab logo
ASM vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ASM and MSFT is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ASM vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ASM:

2.50

MSFT:

0.30

Sortino Ratio

ASM:

3.05

MSFT:

0.61

Omega Ratio

ASM:

1.34

MSFT:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

ASM:

2.46

MSFT:

0.31

Martin Ratio

ASM:

11.04

MSFT:

0.70

Ulcer Index

ASM:

17.44%

MSFT:

10.70%

Daily Std Dev

ASM:

77.81%

MSFT:

25.79%

Max Drawdown

ASM:

-94.10%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

ASM:

-19.12%

MSFT:

-1.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASM:

$461.56M

MSFT:

$3.42T

EPS

ASM:

$0.10

MSFT:

$12.85

PE Ratio

ASM:

31.50

MSFT:

35.59

PEG Ratio

ASM:

0.00

MSFT:

2.15

PS Ratio

ASM:

6.36

MSFT:

12.68

PB Ratio

ASM:

3.45

MSFT:

10.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASM:

$72.62M

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASM:

$31.42M

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASM:

$16.66M

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a 255.28% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 11.33%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.33% annualized return.


ASM

YTD

255.28%

1M

45.58%

6M

181.98%

1Y

192.52%

3Y*

63.21%

5Y*

35.31%

10Y*

11.33%

MSFT

YTD

9.24%

1M

16.62%

6M

8.85%

1Y

7.70%

3Y*

19.84%

5Y*

21.17%

10Y*

27.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

Microsoft Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASM vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASM is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASM is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASM is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASM is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASM is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASM is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASM vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ASM Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASM and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ASM vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.71%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

ASM vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and MSFT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ASM vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 23.82% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.33%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ASM vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
18.84M
70.07B
(ASM) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ASM vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
56.1%
68.7%
(ASM) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
ASM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 10.56M and revenue of 18.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

ASM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.03M and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.6%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

ASM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 5.62M and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.