ASIEX vs. FADMX
ASIEX (American Century Strategic Income Fund) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - ASIEX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by American Century, while FADMX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, ASIEX returned 1.89%/yr vs 3.26%/yr for FADMX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASIEX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.
Performance
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIEX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.46% return.
ASIEX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.59%
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- —
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIEX American Century Strategic Income Fund | 0.70% | 8.01% | 4.91% | 7.22% | -11.12% | 2.33% | 9.17% | 9.77% | -0.39% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 3.46% | 9.01% | 6.02% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIEX and FADMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ASIEX and FADMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIEX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank
ASIEX
FADMX
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Strategic Income Fund (ASIEX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASIEX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.56 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.69 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 16.01 | -9.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIEX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIEX and FADMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIEX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -15.98% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -2.62% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.03% | -3.99% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | -15.98% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -3.05% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.60% | +0.27% |
Volatility
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Strategic Income Fund (ASIEX) is 1.17%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that ASIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIEX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.41% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 3.08% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 3.63% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 4.54% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 4.77% | -0.80% |
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIEX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASIEX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison
ASIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than FADMX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIEX American Century Strategic Income Fund | 5.32% | 5.53% | 5.80% | 5.15% | 2.88% | 5.39% | 3.58% | 3.07% | 3.95% | 3.16% | 3.53% | 4.23% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.28% | 4.33% | 4.16% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIEX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FADMX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to ASIEX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIEX dropped -14.31% vs FADMX's -15.98%.
FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASIEX and FADMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer