ASHR vs. AFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).
ASHR and AFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both ASHR and AFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHR or AFTY.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and AFTY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASHR vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
ASHR
-1.78%
-3.24%
-4.71%
9.59%
0.67%
-2.72%
AFTY
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHR vs. AFTY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASHR
AFTY
ASHR vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHR vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 1.15% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 100.00% | 100.00% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 8.63% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
ASHR vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) at 0.00%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.