PortfoliosLab logo
ASHR vs. AFTY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and AFTY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ASHR vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


ASHR

YTD

-0.08%

1M

4.75%

6M

-4.24%

1Y

6.26%

5Y*

0.35%

10Y*

-2.27%

AFTY

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASHR vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASHR vs. AFTY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASHR is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASHR is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASHR is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASHR is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AFTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFTY is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASHR vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ASHR vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
1.13%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%0.27%
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
100.00%100.00%2.23%0.00%1.84%1.48%8.63%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%0.00%

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

ASHR vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...