ASH vs. IVW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW).

IVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.

Performance

ASH vs. IVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASH vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc.	-4.58%	-15.40%	-13.71%	-20.24%	1.14%	37.67%	5.05%	9.42%	0.90%	-33.98%
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF	-8.16%	21.95%	35.82%	29.83%	-29.50%	31.80%	33.19%	30.77%	-0.21%	27.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASH achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly higher than IVW's -8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ASH has underperformed IVW with an annualized return of -5.07%, while IVW has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.

ASH

• 1D: 6.39%
• 1M: -10.82%
• YTD: -4.58%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: -3.34%
• 3Y*: -16.62%
• 5Y*: -7.53%
• 10Y*: -5.07%

IVW

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -8.16%
• 6M: -6.12%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 21.71%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ASH vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASH

ASH Risk / Return Rank: 36
ASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ASH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ASH Martin Ratio Rank: 38

IVW

IVW Risk / Return Rank: 66
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASH vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASH	IVW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	1.01	-1.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	1.57	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.22	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	1.65	-1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	6.48	-6.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASH vs. IVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASH Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the IVW Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASH and IVW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASH	IVW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	1.01	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.58	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	0.76	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.41	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ASH and IVW is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ASH vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison

ASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than IVW's 0.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc.	2.99%	2.81%	2.24%	1.77%	1.21%	1.09%	1.39%	1.40%	1.37%	1.50%	1.43%	1.47%
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.43%	0.40%	0.43%	1.03%	0.92%	0.46%	0.82%	1.63%	1.28%	1.30%	1.51%	1.51%

Drawdowns

ASH vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASH drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than IVW's maximum drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASH and IVW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASH	IVW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.64%	-57.33%	-34.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.17%	-13.75%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.29%	-32.72%	-24.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.54%	-32.72%	-34.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.56%	-10.26%	-39.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.04%	-17.73%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.22%	3.51%	+8.71%

Volatility

ASH vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison

Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) at 7.14%. This indicates that ASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASH	IVW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.10%	7.14%	+5.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.03%	12.61%	+13.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.11%	22.25%	+17.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.20%	21.12%	+9.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.92%	20.54%	+12.38%