PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASH vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASH vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASH achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 14.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ASH has underperformed IVOO with an annualized return of 3.18%, while IVOO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.


ASH

1D
-5.54%
1M
12.58%
YTD
10.52%
6M
9.77%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
-5.73%
5Y*
-4.34%
10Y*
3.18%

IVOO

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.69%
YTD
14.65%
6M
12.56%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASH vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
10.52%-15.40%-13.71%-20.24%1.14%37.67%5.05%9.42%0.90%34.94%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.65%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ASH and IVOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.68

The correlation between ASH and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASH vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASH
ASH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASH vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.87

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

10.47

-7.24

ASH vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASH Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASH and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASH vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASH drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than IVOO's maximum drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASH and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.64%

-42.33%

-49.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-8.81%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.26%

-24.22%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.29%

-24.22%

-33.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.29%

-42.33%

-14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.08%

-1.12%

-37.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-5.25%

-12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

2.41%

+7.41%

Volatility

ASH vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a higher volatility of 12.85% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.73%. This indicates that ASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.85%

4.73%

+8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.73%

11.77%

+18.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.51%

15.89%

+23.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.53%

19.74%

+11.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.09%

21.19%

+8.90%

Dividends

ASH vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

ASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
2.60%2.81%2.24%1.77%1.21%1.09%1.39%1.40%1.37%88.83%1.43%1.47%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASH and IVOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASH has higher volatility (12.85%) compared to IVOO (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASH dropped -91.64% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASH and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer