PortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. VHT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and VHT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ASEA vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ASEA:

0.89

VHT:

-0.51

Sortino Ratio

ASEA:

1.15

VHT:

-0.60

Omega Ratio

ASEA:

1.16

VHT:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

ASEA:

0.62

VHT:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

ASEA:

1.80

VHT:

-1.19

Ulcer Index

ASEA:

7.68%

VHT:

6.95%

Daily Std Dev

ASEA:

18.60%

VHT:

16.09%

Max Drawdown

ASEA:

-44.14%

VHT:

-39.12%

Current Drawdown

ASEA:

-5.09%

VHT:

-15.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 3.63%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.18% annualized return.


ASEA

YTD

5.42%

1M

8.10%

6M

2.36%

1Y

16.39%

3Y*

7.80%

5Y*

11.49%

10Y*

3.63%

VHT

YTD

-4.54%

1M

0.24%

6M

-7.59%

1Y

-8.23%

3Y*

1.99%

5Y*

6.25%

10Y*

7.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF

Vanguard Health Care ETF

ASEA vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASEA vs. VHT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASEA is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASEA is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASEA is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASEA is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VHT is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VHT is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VHT is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VHT is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VHT is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VHT is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASEA vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and VHT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ASEA vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VHT's 1.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.42%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.18%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%2.65%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.65%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%1.02%

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and VHT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ASEA vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 3.24%, while Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...