PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ASEA vs. FM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ASEAFM
YTD Return16.72%7.18%
1Y Return24.06%11.04%
3Y Return (Ann)7.93%-5.21%
5Y Return (Ann)5.23%2.46%
10Y Return (Ann)3.80%1.10%
Sharpe Ratio1.651.00
Sortino Ratio2.381.40
Omega Ratio1.291.20
Calmar Ratio2.080.34
Martin Ratio10.024.60
Ulcer Index2.39%2.19%
Daily Std Dev14.47%10.11%
Max Drawdown-44.13%-41.63%
Current Drawdown-4.31%-17.13%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ASEA and FM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ASEA vs. FM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than FM's 7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has outperformed FM with an annualized return of 3.80%, while FM has yielded a comparatively lower 1.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
21.69%
3.55%
ASEA
FM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASEA vs. FM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FM's 0.79% expense ratio.


FM
iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF
Expense ratio chart for FM: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for ASEA: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASEA vs. FM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASEA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASEA, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASEA, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASEA, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASEA, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASEA, currently valued at 10.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.02
FM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FM, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FM, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FM, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FM, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FM, currently valued at 4.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.60

ASEA vs. FM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and FM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.65
1.00
ASEA
FM

Dividends

ASEA vs. FM - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than FM's 4.16% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.58%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%2.65%3.83%
FM
iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF
4.16%3.62%2.70%2.04%2.91%3.12%4.29%2.04%2.15%2.76%12.35%1.11%

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. FM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, which is greater than FM's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and FM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-4.31%
-17.13%
ASEA
FM

Volatility

ASEA vs. FM - Volatility Comparison

Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) at 0.83%. This indicates that ASEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.30%
0.83%
ASEA
FM