PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCIX vs. CDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASCIX vs. CDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (ASCIX) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASCIX vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ASCIX
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund
0.38%8.04%11.06%11.95%-4.63%
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
-2.19%9.51%7.71%12.74%-8.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCIX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.19% return.


ASCIX

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
0.38%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*

CDX

1D
0.52%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
-2.19%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASCIX vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASCIX vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCIX
ASCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CDX
CDX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCIX vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (ASCIX) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASCIXCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

0.04

+1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

0.19

+3.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.04

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.13

+4.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

0.21

+10.38

ASCIX vs. CDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCIX and CDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCIXCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.04

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.40

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between ASCIX and CDX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASCIX vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison

ASCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than CDX's 8.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASCIX
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund
7.85%8.55%8.77%8.40%8.04%13.64%8.74%6.97%6.14%
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
8.43%7.18%12.60%5.26%7.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ASCIX vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCIX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, which is greater than CDX's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCIX and CDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCIXCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-13.24%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-8.88%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-7.17%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-4.24%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

5.46%

-4.84%

Volatility

ASCIX vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (ASCIX) is 0.49%, while Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that ASCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASCIXCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

3.07%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

4.14%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

16.11%

-12.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.51%

11.24%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

11.24%

-5.79%