PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASC vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASC achieves a 55.30% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ASC has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 7.63%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


ASC

1D
-1.36%
1M
-11.84%
YTD
55.30%
6M
34.26%
1Y
73.58%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
35.42%
10Y*
7.63%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
55.30%-10.36%-8.18%5.81%326.33%3.36%-63.57%93.79%-41.63%8.11%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ASC and XLE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.37

The correlation between ASC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASC
ASC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASCXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.75

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

10.92

-2.40

ASC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASC Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.21

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.35

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.31

-0.22

Drawdowns

ASC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASC drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASC and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.11%

-71.26%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-12.05%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.41%

-20.14%

-41.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.41%

-26.04%

-35.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.72%

-66.81%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.96%

-6.15%

-17.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-17.98%

-21.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.66%

4.14%

+4.52%

Volatility

ASC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that ASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.54%

8.25%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.96%

16.58%

+10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.13%

20.53%

+15.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.93%

26.02%

+19.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.40%

29.59%

+21.81%

Dividends

ASC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

ASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
4.07%2.83%8.89%8.16%0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.41%4.80%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASC and XLE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASC has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASC dropped -80.11% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASC and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer