ASA vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASA (ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Over the past 3 years, ASA returned 56.92%/yr vs 32.39%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ASA vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASA achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 25.76% return.

ASA

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 81.49%
• 3Y*: 56.92%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 16.93%

CLSE

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 25.76%
• 6M: 28.57%
• 1Y: 50.91%
• 3Y*: 32.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASA vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	1.86%	195.60%	34.55%	5.38%	-35.11%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	25.76%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ASA and CLSE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022	0.18

Return for Risk

ASA vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASA

ASA Risk / Return Rank: 79
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASA vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASA	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	3.84	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	5.20	-3.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.67	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	10.55	-8.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	39.58	-32.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASA vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASA Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASA and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASA	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	3.84	-2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	1.59	-1.43

Drawdowns

ASA vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASA drawdown since its inception was -80.36%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASA and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASA	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.36%	-16.45%	-63.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.51%	-4.85%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.51%	-16.45%	-16.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.23%	0.00%	-25.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.54%	-3.59%	-38.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.95%	1.29%	+10.66%

Volatility

ASA vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.31%. This indicates that ASA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASA	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.37%	4.31%	+11.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.13%	10.21%	+28.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.46%	13.32%	+34.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.13%	13.88%	+21.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.36%	13.88%	+21.48%

Dividends

ASA vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CLSE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	0.12%	0.10%	0.20%	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.32%	0.35%	0.36%	0.56%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASA and CLSE in my portfolio?

ASA and CLSE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASA or CLSE?

ASA has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASA dropped -80.36% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.