PortfoliosLab logo
ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARX.TO and CJ.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARC Resources Ltd. (ARX.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARX.TO:

0.69

CJ.TO:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

ARX.TO:

1.15

CJ.TO:

0.40

Omega Ratio

ARX.TO:

1.14

CJ.TO:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

ARX.TO:

0.22

CJ.TO:

0.08

Martin Ratio

ARX.TO:

2.86

CJ.TO:

0.56

Ulcer Index

ARX.TO:

7.83%

CJ.TO:

7.38%

Daily Std Dev

ARX.TO:

32.50%

CJ.TO:

30.59%

Max Drawdown

ARX.TO:

-100.00%

CJ.TO:

-97.53%

Current Drawdown

ARX.TO:

-99.98%

CJ.TO:

-40.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARX.TO:

CA$17.36B

CJ.TO:

CA$994.96M

EPS

ARX.TO:

CA$2.26

CJ.TO:

CA$0.70

PE Ratio

ARX.TO:

13.13

CJ.TO:

8.86

PEG Ratio

ARX.TO:

2.65

CJ.TO:

5.59

PS Ratio

ARX.TO:

3.20

CJ.TO:

1.98

PB Ratio

ARX.TO:

2.14

CJ.TO:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARX.TO:

CA$5.85B

CJ.TO:

CA$591.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARX.TO:

CA$2.86B

CJ.TO:

CA$344.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARX.TO:

CA$1.45B

CJ.TO:

CA$147.33M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARX.TO achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than CJ.TO's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ARX.TO has outperformed CJ.TO with an annualized return of 7.09%, while CJ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.39% annualized return.


ARX.TO

YTD

15.11%

1M

13.00%

6M

13.14%

1Y

22.47%

3Y*

19.89%

5Y*

43.11%

10Y*

7.09%

CJ.TO

YTD

1.11%

1M

3.79%

6M

-0.09%

1Y

3.52%

3Y*

-2.80%

5Y*

77.84%

10Y*

-2.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ARC Resources Ltd.

Cardinal Energy Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARX.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARX.TO is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARX.TO is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARX.TO is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARX.TO is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARX.TO is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARX.TO is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CJ.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CJ.TO is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CJ.TO is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARC Resources Ltd. (ARX.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the CJ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARX.TO and CJ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ARX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than CJ.TO's 11.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARX.TO
ARC Resources Ltd.
2.42%2.69%3.36%2.68%2.49%5.00%7.33%7.41%4.07%2.81%7.18%4.76%
CJ.TO
Cardinal Energy Ltd.
11.41%11.11%11.46%4.99%0.00%3.66%5.77%17.79%8.25%3.96%9.56%5.27%

Drawdowns

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARX.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CJ.TO drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARX.TO and CJ.TO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARC Resources Ltd. (ARX.TO) is 7.81%, while Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that ARX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ARC Resources Ltd. and Cardinal Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
1.80B
150.93M
(ARX.TO) Total Revenue
(CJ.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ARX.TO vs. CJ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ARC Resources Ltd. and Cardinal Energy Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
55.0%
62.6%
(ARX.TO) Gross Margin
(CJ.TO) Gross Margin
ARX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ARC Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 987.60M and revenue of 1.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

CJ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 94.43M and revenue of 150.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

ARX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ARC Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of 581.80M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.

CJ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 34.95M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

ARX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ARC Resources Ltd. reported a net income of 404.70M and revenue of 1.80B, resulting in a net margin of 22.5%.

CJ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 21.40M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.