ARW vs. GRMN

In the year-to-date period, ARW achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than GRMN's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ARW has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 5.70%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ARW Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the GRMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARW and GRMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ARW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

The maximum ARW drawdown since its inception was -81.12%, smaller than the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARW and GRMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 7.32%. This indicates that ARW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.