ARW vs. GRMN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN).

Performance

ARW vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARW vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.	33.08%	-2.60%	-7.47%	16.91%	-22.12%	38.00%	14.82%	22.90%	-14.25%	12.78%
GRMN Garmin Ltd.	17.56%	-0.06%	63.25%	43.12%	-30.20%	15.90%	25.86%	58.13%	9.84%	27.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARW : $7.61B GRMN : $46.04B
EPS ARW : $10.94 GRMN : $8.60
PE Ratio ARW : 13.41 GRMN : 27.64
PEG Ratio ARW : 4.27 GRMN : 2.22
PS Ratio ARW : 0.25 GRMN : 6.35
PB Ratio ARW : 1.16 GRMN : 5.13
Total Revenue (TTM) ARW : $30.85B GRMN : $7.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARW : $3.47B GRMN : $4.26B
EBITDA (TTM) ARW : $969.41M GRMN : $2.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARW achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than GRMN's 17.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ARW has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 8.42%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.84% annualized return.

ARW

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 33.08%
• 6M: 20.49%
• 1Y: 42.06%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: 8.42%

GRMN

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 17.56%
• 6M: -6.14%
• 1Y: 10.99%
• 3Y*: 35.56%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 22.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARW vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARW

ARW Risk / Return Rank: 75
ARW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ARW Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ARW Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ARW Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ARW Martin Ratio Rank: 72

GRMN

GRMN Risk / Return Rank: 49
GRMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GRMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GRMN Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GRMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GRMN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARW vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARW	GRMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.31	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	0.62	+1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.10	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	0.40	+1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	0.86	+3.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARW vs. GRMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARW Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the GRMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARW and GRMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARW	GRMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.31	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.50	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.81	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.45	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ARW and GRMN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ARW vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison

ARW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GRMN Garmin Ltd.	1.52%	1.70%	1.44%	2.27%	3.10%	1.92%	2.01%	2.30%	3.32%	3.42%	4.21%	5.41%

Drawdowns

ARW vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARW drawdown since its inception was -86.03%, roughly equal to the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARW and GRMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARW	GRMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.03%	-87.71%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.54%	-27.97%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.16%	-54.63%	+16.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.77%	-54.63%	+1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.16%	-7.80%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.42%	-31.70%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.88%	13.05%	-3.17%

Volatility

ARW vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) at 9.08%. This indicates that ARW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARW	GRMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	9.08%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.42%	23.96%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.09%	35.86%	-1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.39%	30.07%	-1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.18%	28.21%	+0.97%

Financials

ARW vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Garmin Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ARW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 8.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

GRMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

ARW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 410.20M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

GRMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 614.15M and revenue of 2.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

ARW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 194.60M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

GRMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 528.68M and revenue of 2.12B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.