PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARTNA vs. CWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ARTNA vs. CWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) and California Water Service Group (CWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARTNA vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARTNA
Artesian Resources Corporation
3.19%3.83%-21.20%-27.63%29.29%28.22%2.47%9.66%-7.19%23.91%
CWT
California Water Service Group
5.83%-1.81%-10.64%-12.83%-14.13%35.05%6.68%9.85%7.06%36.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARTNA:

$333.41M

CWT:

$2.72B

EPS

ARTNA:

$2.21

CWT:

$2.15

PE Ratio

ARTNA:

14.60

CWT:

21.17

PEG Ratio

ARTNA:

2.41

CWT:

0.51

PS Ratio

ARTNA:

2.95

CWT:

2.71

PB Ratio

ARTNA:

1.33

CWT:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARTNA:

$112.94M

CWT:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARTNA:

$48.78M

CWT:

$436.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARTNA:

$52.60M

CWT:

$329.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTNA achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than CWT's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ARTNA has underperformed CWT with an annualized return of 4.48%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.52% annualized return.


ARTNA

1D
1.44%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.64%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
-13.66%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
4.48%

CWT

1D
0.37%
1M
0.26%
YTD
5.83%
6M
3.60%
1Y
-4.05%
3Y*
-5.65%
5Y*
-2.12%
10Y*
7.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARTNA vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTNA
ARTNA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ARTNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTNA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTNA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CWT
CWT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTNA vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARTNACWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

-0.18

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.26

-0.09

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.99

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.22

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.48

-0.37

+0.85

ARTNA vs. CWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the CWT Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTNA and CWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARTNACWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

-0.18

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

-0.09

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.27

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.31

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between ARTNA and CWT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ARTNA vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison

ARTNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than CWT's 2.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARTNA
Artesian Resources Corporation
3.84%3.89%3.74%2.74%1.86%2.26%2.71%2.64%2.74%2.40%2.82%3.15%
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.71%2.86%2.47%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%

Drawdowns

ARTNA vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTNA drawdown since its inception was -49.39%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTNA and CWT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ARTNACWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.39%

-38.21%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-16.03%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.39%

-38.21%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.39%

-38.21%

-11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.23%

-30.50%

-11.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-11.60%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

9.57%

-3.77%

Volatility

ARTNA vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison

Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to California Water Service Group (CWT) at 7.67%. This indicates that ARTNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ARTNACWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

7.67%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.24%

17.80%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.37%

23.04%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

23.85%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.08%

27.55%

+0.53%

Financials

ARTNA vs. CWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Artesian Resources Corporation and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
28.02M
219.98M
(ARTNA) Total Revenue
(CWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARTNA vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Artesian Resources Corporation and California Water Service Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
32.2%
0
Portfolio components
ARTNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artesian Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.01M and revenue of 28.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

CWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 219.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ARTNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artesian Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 7.11M and revenue of 28.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

CWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 25.60M and revenue of 219.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ARTNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artesian Resources Corporation reported a net income of 4.13M and revenue of 28.02M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.

CWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 11.48M and revenue of 219.98M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.