PortfoliosLab logo
ARTNA vs. CWT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARTNA and CWT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ARTNA vs. CWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) and California Water Service Group (CWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARTNA:

0.06

CWT:

-0.02

Sortino Ratio

ARTNA:

0.40

CWT:

0.09

Omega Ratio

ARTNA:

1.04

CWT:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

ARTNA:

0.07

CWT:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

ARTNA:

0.24

CWT:

-0.11

Ulcer Index

ARTNA:

14.96%

CWT:

11.07%

Daily Std Dev

ARTNA:

26.68%

CWT:

23.06%

Max Drawdown

ARTNA:

-49.39%

CWT:

-38.24%

Current Drawdown

ARTNA:

-40.07%

CWT:

-29.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARTNA:

$348.12M

CWT:

$2.79B

EPS

ARTNA:

$2.08

CWT:

$2.26

PE Ratio

ARTNA:

16.34

CWT:

20.74

PEG Ratio

ARTNA:

7.29

CWT:

2.70

PS Ratio

ARTNA:

3.19

CWT:

2.88

PB Ratio

ARTNA:

1.45

CWT:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARTNA:

$109.29M

CWT:

$970.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARTNA:

$54.38M

CWT:

$532.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARTNA:

$51.20M

CWT:

$351.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTNA achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than CWT's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ARTNA has underperformed CWT with an annualized return of 7.86%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


ARTNA

YTD

11.16%

1M

-2.00%

6M

1.17%

1Y

1.70%

3Y*

-8.56%

5Y*

2.40%

10Y*

7.86%

CWT

YTD

5.61%

1M

-6.13%

6M

-6.48%

1Y

-0.50%

3Y*

-2.15%

5Y*

2.04%

10Y*

8.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Artesian Resources Corporation

California Water Service Group

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARTNA vs. CWT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARTNA is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARTNA is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARTNA is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARTNA is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARTNA is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARTNA is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CWT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWT is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWT is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARTNA vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARTNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the CWT Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTNA and CWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ARTNA vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison

ARTNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than CWT's 2.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARTNA
Artesian Resources Corporation
3.49%3.74%2.74%1.86%2.26%2.72%2.64%2.74%2.40%2.82%3.15%3.75%
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.46%2.43%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%

Drawdowns

ARTNA vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTNA drawdown since its inception was -49.39%, which is greater than CWT's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTNA and CWT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ARTNA vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is 7.46%, while California Water Service Group (CWT) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that ARTNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARTNA vs. CWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Artesian Resources Corporation and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
25.89M
203.97M
(ARTNA) Total Revenue
(CWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARTNA vs. CWT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Artesian Resources Corporation and California Water Service Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
48.1%
67.0%
(ARTNA) Gross Margin
(CWT) Gross Margin
ARTNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artesian Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.44M and revenue of 25.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.

CWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 136.58M and revenue of 203.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

ARTNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artesian Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 5.55M and revenue of 25.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

CWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 22.35M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

ARTNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Artesian Resources Corporation reported a net income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

CWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 13.33M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.