PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARQT vs. SMMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARQT vs. SMMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQT achieves a -28.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMMT's -15.04% return.


ARQT

1D
-3.17%
1M
-10.96%
YTD
-28.41%
6M
-29.36%
1Y
54.23%
3Y*
36.36%
5Y*
-4.91%
10Y*

SMMT

1D
-5.41%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
-15.04%
6M
-13.86%
1Y
-16.16%
3Y*
101.73%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
5.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARQT vs. SMMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
-28.41%108.47%331.27%-78.18%-28.64%-26.27%29.04%
SMMT
Summit Therapeutics Inc.
-15.04%-1.99%583.72%-38.59%57.99%-42.77%207.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ARQT and SMMT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARQT:

$2.69B

SMMT:

$11.52B

EPS

ARQT:

-$0.02

SMMT:

-$1.60

PB Ratio

ARQT:

14.18

SMMT:

21.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARQT:

$415.62M

SMMT:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARQT:

$377.98M

SMMT:

-$83.36K

EBITDA (TTM)

ARQT:

$12.21M

SMMT:

-$738.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARQT vs. SMMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQT
ARQT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ARQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARQT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ARQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMT
SMMT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARQT vs. SMMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARQTSMMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

-0.21

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

0.24

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.03

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

-0.35

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

-0.55

+4.37

ARQT vs. SMMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQT Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the SMMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQT and SMMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARQTSMMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

-0.21

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.08

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.02

-0.03

Drawdowns

ARQT vs. SMMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMT drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQT and SMMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARQTSMMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.02%

-95.75%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.50%

-52.76%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.24%

-62.26%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.67%

-91.78%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.78%

-59.51%

+15.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.16%

-57.64%

+7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.53%

33.74%

-18.21%

Volatility

ARQT vs. SMMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) is 19.92%, while Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) has a volatility of 23.53%. This indicates that ARQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARQTSMMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.92%

23.53%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.68%

56.85%

-20.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.61%

77.73%

-20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.78%

185.12%

-113.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.00%

144.67%

-67.67%

Dividends

ARQT vs. SMMT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQT nor SMMT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ARQT vs. SMMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
105.40M
0
(ARQT) Total Revenue
(SMMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARQT and SMMT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMT has higher volatility (23.53%) compared to ARQT (19.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARQT dropped -95.02% vs SMMT's -95.75%.

ARQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARQT and SMMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer