ARQQW vs. INTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ).

Performance

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARQQW Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants	-4.15%	-94.21%	2,950.43%	-82.85%	-92.67%	1,060.00%
INTZ Intrusion Inc.	-28.64%	-62.60%	-39.23%	-91.99%	-8.14%	-86.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARQQW : $2.26M INTZ : $16.50M
EPS ARQQW : -$5.88 INTZ : -$0.45
PS Ratio ARQQW : 2.45 INTZ : 2.31
PB Ratio ARQQW : 0.08 INTZ : 2.27
Total Revenue (TTM) ARQQW : $924.00K INTZ : $7.10M
Gross Profit (TTM) ARQQW : -$1.28M INTZ : $5.38M
EBITDA (TTM) ARQQW : -$57.09M INTZ : -$7.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQW achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly higher than INTZ's -28.64% return.

ARQQW

• 1D: 8.82%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: -4.15%
• 6M: -84.26%
• 1Y: -92.67%
• 3Y*: -26.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTZ

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -24.72%
• YTD: -28.64%
• 6M: -48.71%
• 1Y: -26.73%
• 3Y*: -67.27%
• 5Y*: -72.31%
• 10Y*: -23.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARQQW vs. INTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQQW

ARQQW Risk / Return Rank: 23
ARQQW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ARQQW Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ARQQW Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ARQQW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ARQQW Martin Ratio Rank: 19

INTZ

INTZ Risk / Return Rank: 32
INTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
INTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
INTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
INTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
INTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARQQW	INTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	-0.27	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	0.26	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.03	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	-0.40	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	-0.74	-0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQQW Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the INTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQW and INTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARQQW	INTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	-0.27	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	-0.10	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQW and INTZ is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQQW nor INTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQW drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum INTZ drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQW and INTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARQQW	INTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-99.94%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.32%	-69.80%	-26.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.25%	-99.85%	+1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.86%	-56.19%	-21.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	76.84%	37.98%	+38.86%

Volatility

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) is 16.85%, while Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) has a volatility of 33.10%. This indicates that ARQQW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARQQW	INTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.85%	33.10%	-16.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.31%	66.76%	+28.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	274.48%	98.71%	+175.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	244.76%	222.03%	+22.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	244.76%	179.70%	+65.06%

Financials