PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARQQW vs. INTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQW achieves a -80.25% return, which is significantly lower than INTZ's -33.04% return.


ARQQW

1D
-7.29%
1M
-49.17%
6M
-81.23%
YTD
-80.25%
1Y
-93.03%
3Y*
-58.28%
5Y*
-53.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.90%

INTZ

1D
-2.53%
1M
-3.19%
6M
-25.96%
YTD
-33.04%
1Y
-56.74%
3Y*
-66.46%
5Y*
-61.48%
10Y*
-17.70%
ALL TIME*
-11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$873.18$1.17K$3.49K
$184.98K$411.24K$1.85M

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARQQW
Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants
-80.25%-94.21%2,950.43%-82.85%-92.67%1,060.00%
INTZ
Intrusion Inc.
-33.04%-62.60%-39.23%-91.99%-8.14%-87.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQW and INTZ is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARQQW:

$210.20M

INTZ:

$17.52M

EPS

ARQQW:

-$4.72

INTZ:

-$0.52

PS Ratio

ARQQW:

0.34

INTZ:

2.49

PB Ratio

ARQQW:

0.02

INTZ:

4.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARQQW:

$1.43M

INTZ:

$6.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARQQW:

-$307.00K

INTZ:

$4.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARQQW:

-$68.30M

INTZ:

-$9.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants

Intrusion Inc.

Often compared with INTZ:
INTZ vs. BBAIINTZ vs. CAN

Return for Risk

ARQQW vs. INTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARQQW
ARQQW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARQQW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARQQW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARQQW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ARQQW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARQQW Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

INTZ
INTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
INTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARQQWINTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.91

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.87

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

-1.33

+0.20

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQQW Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the INTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQW and INTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQW drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum INTZ drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQW and INTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARQQWINTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-99.94%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.30%

-67.96%

-30.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.27%

-98.29%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.64%

-99.68%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.64%

-99.86%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.13%

-57.22%

-21.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

82.35%

44.55%

+37.80%

Volatility

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Volatility Comparison

Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) has a higher volatility of 56.86% compared to Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) at 22.73%. This indicates that ARQQW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARQQWINTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

56.86%

22.73%

+34.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.37%

73.14%

+35.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

277.89%

92.98%

+184.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

247.15%

218.10%

+29.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

240.80%

178.67%

+62.13%

Dividends

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQQW nor INTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ARQQW vs. INTZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants and Intrusion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARQQW and INTZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARQQW has higher volatility (56.86%) compared to INTZ (22.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARQQW dropped -99.64% vs INTZ's -99.94%.

ARQQW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARQQW and INTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer