ARQQW vs. INTZ
ARQQW (Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants) and INTZ (Intrusion Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, ARQQW returned -49.02%/yr vs -66.59%/yr for INTZ. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARQQW achieves a -68.78% return, which is significantly lower than INTZ's -18.61% return.
ARQQW
- 1D
- -8.54%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -77.21%
- YTD
- -68.78%
- 1Y
- -94.70%
- 3Y*
- -49.97%
- 5Y*
- -49.02%
- 10Y*
- —
INTZ
- 1D
- 7.81%
- 1M
- 24.80%
- 6M
- -24.21%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- -55.22%
- 3Y*
- -65.09%
- 5Y*
- -66.59%
- 10Y*
- -16.96%
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARQQW Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants | -68.78% | -94.21% | 2,950.43% | -82.85% | -92.67% | 1,060.00% |
INTZ Intrusion Inc. | -18.61% | -62.60% | -39.23% | -91.99% | -8.14% | -87.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARQQW and INTZ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
ARQQW:
$377.10M
INTZ:
$21.29M
ARQQW:
-$4.72
INTZ:
-$0.52
ARQQW:
0.54
INTZ:
3.03
ARQQW:
0.03
INTZ:
5.13
ARQQW:
$1.43M
INTZ:
$6.21M
ARQQW:
-$307.00K
INTZ:
$4.70M
ARQQW:
-$68.30M
INTZ:
-$9.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARQQW vs. INTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ARQQW
INTZ
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) and Intrusion Inc. (INTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARQQW | INTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.85 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -1.31 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARQQW drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum INTZ drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQW and INTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARQQW | INTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.48% | -99.94% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.50% | -70.13% | -27.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.93% | -98.38% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.48% | -99.82% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.43% | -99.83% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -57.04% | -21.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 81.65% | 47.56% | +34.09% |
Volatility
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Volatility Comparison
Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants (ARQQW) has a higher volatility of 69.58% compared to Intrusion Inc. (INTZ) at 43.03%. This indicates that ARQQW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARQQW | INTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 69.58% | 43.03% | +26.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.78% | 74.08% | +27.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 279.99% | 92.72% | +187.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 246.53% | 220.70% | +25.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 241.52% | 178.83% | +62.69% |
Dividends
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARQQW nor INTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ARQQW vs. INTZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arqit Quantum Inc. Warrants and Intrusion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ARQQW and INTZ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARQQW has higher volatility (69.58%) compared to INTZ (43.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARQQW dropped -99.48% vs INTZ's -99.94%.
ARQQW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARQQW and INTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer