PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARQQ vs. CLSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQ achieves a -35.01% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 65.81% return.


ARQQ

1D
-2.87%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-35.01%
6M
-54.86%
1Y
-39.23%
3Y*
-25.76%
5Y*
10Y*

CLSK

1D
-4.71%
1M
25.13%
YTD
65.81%
6M
11.64%
1Y
76.08%
3Y*
62.37%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
-5.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARQQ
Arqit Quantum Inc.
-35.01%-43.67%227.76%-86.87%-84.93%111.95%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
65.81%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-31.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQ and CLSK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2021

0.30

Over the past year, ARQQ and CLSK have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

ARQQ:

-$4.72

CLSK:

-$2.24

PS Ratio

ARQQ:

158.69

CLSK:

5.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARQQ:

$1.43M

CLSK:

$739.88M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$307.00K

CLSK:

$306.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$68.30M

CLSK:

-$103.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARQQ vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQQ
ARQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ARQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ARQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARQQCLSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.18

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

1.97

-2.72

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQ and CLSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARQQCLSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

0.87

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.03

-0.32

Drawdowns

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQ drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQ and CLSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARQQCLSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.60%

-98.56%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.78%

-64.74%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.47%

-71.28%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.51%

-77.01%

-21.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.81%

-69.49%

-19.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.43%

38.67%

+13.76%

Volatility

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) has a higher volatility of 31.95% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 21.14%. This indicates that ARQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARQQCLSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.95%

21.14%

+10.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.86%

62.43%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.60%

88.30%

+17.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.90%

100.73%

+33.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.90%

183.19%

-49.29%

Dividends

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQQ nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arqit Quantum Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
623.00K
136.41M
(ARQQ) Total Revenue
(CLSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARQQ and CLSK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARQQ has higher volatility (31.95%) compared to CLSK (21.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARQQ dropped -99.60% vs CLSK's -98.56%.

CLSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARQQ and CLSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer