ARQQ vs. CLSK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).

Performance

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc.	-37.89%	-43.67%	227.76%	-86.87%	-84.93%	111.95%
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.	-14.82%	9.88%	-16.50%	440.69%	-78.57%	-31.01%

Fundamentals

EPS ARQQ : -$5.88 CLSK : -$1.28
PS Ratio ARQQ : 224.91 CLSK : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) ARQQ : $924.00K CLSK : $785.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) ARQQ : -$1.28M CLSK : $256.57M
EBITDA (TTM) ARQQ : -$57.09M CLSK : $131.94M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQ achieves a -37.89% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's -14.82% return.

ARQQ

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -19.40%
• YTD: -37.89%
• 6M: -67.01%
• 1Y: 1.27%
• 3Y*: -27.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -18.29%
• YTD: -14.82%
• 6M: -40.92%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 45.82%
• 5Y*: -17.81%
• 10Y*: -11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARQQ vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQQ

ARQQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
ARQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ARQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ARQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ARQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ARQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CLSK

CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 50
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARQQ	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	0.16	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	0.92	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	0.44	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.05	0.83	-0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQ and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARQQ	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	0.16	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	-0.06	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQ and CLSK is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQQ nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQ drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQ and CLSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARQQ	CLSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.60%	-98.56%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.78%	-64.74%	-15.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.57%	-88.19%	-10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.43%	-69.28%	-19.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.19%	34.21%	+7.98%

Volatility

ARQQ vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) have volatilities of 20.71% and 21.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARQQ	CLSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.71%	21.41%	-0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.91%	70.96%	+2.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.05%	91.38%	+17.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	134.98%	101.40%	+33.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	134.98%	184.27%	-49.29%

Financials