AROC vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Archrock, Inc. (AROC) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

AROC vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archrock, Inc. (AROC) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AROC vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AROC Archrock, Inc.	34.66%	7.96%	67.59%	80.96%	28.83%	-7.83%	-5.58%	41.84%	-25.29%	-17.11%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-16.32%	-11.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AROC : $6.07B CLS : $32.65B
EPS AROC : $1.84 CLS : $7.19
PE Ratio AROC : 18.88 CLS : 39.16
PEG Ratio AROC : 0.23 CLS : 0.53
PS Ratio AROC : 4.08 CLS : 2.63
PB Ratio AROC : 4.07 CLS : 14.76
Total Revenue (TTM) AROC : $1.49B CLS : $12.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) AROC : $711.83M CLS : $1.44B
EBITDA (TTM) AROC : $845.24M CLS : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AROC achieves a 34.66% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's -4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, AROC has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 24.13%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 38.34% annualized return.

AROC

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 34.66%
• 6M: 34.27%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 58.61%
• 5Y*: 35.49%
• 10Y*: 24.13%

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AROC vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AROC

AROC Risk / Return Rank: 72
AROC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AROC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AROC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AROC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AROC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AROC vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archrock, Inc. (AROC) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AROC	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	3.61	-2.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.28	-1.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.44	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	8.23	-6.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.36	21.92	-17.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AROC vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AROC Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AROC and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AROC	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	3.61	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	1.81	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.79	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.25	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between AROC and CLS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AROC vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

AROC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AROC Archrock, Inc.	2.39%	3.07%	2.69%	3.96%	6.46%	7.75%	6.70%	5.52%	6.73%	4.57%	3.77%
CLS Celestica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AROC vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AROC drawdown since its inception was -84.90%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AROC and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AROC	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.90%	-96.93%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.54%	-29.24%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	-53.96%	+16.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.90%	-80.60%	-4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.05%	-20.12%	+14.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.93%	-73.79%	+48.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.24%	10.98%	-2.74%

Volatility

AROC vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Archrock, Inc. (AROC) is 8.95%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.87%. This indicates that AROC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AROC	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	23.87%	-14.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.95%	54.95%	-34.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.31%	72.02%	-36.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.62%	55.73%	-19.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.15%	48.76%	+4.39%

Financials

AROC vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Archrock, Inc. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AROC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archrock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 377.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

AROC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archrock, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 377.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

AROC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archrock, Inc. reported a net income of 116.77M and revenue of 377.07M, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.