ARKW vs. SMH
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. ARKW is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.34%/yr vs 37.78%/yr for SMH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
ARKW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 71.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 22.34%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.78% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- 36.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
SMH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 71.86%
- 6M
- 69.95%
- 1Y
- 128.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 37.78%
ARKW vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -6.26% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 71.86% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and SMH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ARKW and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKW vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ARKW
SMH
Communication Services
ARKW
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
SMH
-
Financial Services
ARKW
SMH
-
Industrials
ARKW
SMH
-
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Energy
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Utilities
ARKW
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
SMH
ARKW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.55 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 8.67 | -8.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 31.31 | -31.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -84.96% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -14.93% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -35.74% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -45.30% | -32.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -45.30% | -35.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.87% | -7.47% | -17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -41.00% | +17.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 4.12% | +14.08% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is 11.17%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that ARKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 19.07% | -7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.67% | 29.12% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 34.88% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 35.82% | +7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 32.96% | +4.82% |
ARKW vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.70% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and SMH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to ARKW (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.78% vs 22.34% for ARKW. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 11.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.78% return vs 22.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: ARK and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer