PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 21.70% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 22.42%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


ARKQ

1D
0.51%
1M
9.53%
YTD
21.70%
6M
21.88%
1Y
73.83%
3Y*
39.06%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
22.42%

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
21.70%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and VGT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.77

The correlation between ARKQ and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKQ
VGT

Industrials

37.1%
0.4%

Technology

32.6%
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

8.1%
0.5%

Healthcare

2.2%
0.0%

Energy

1.9%
0.3%

Utilities

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ARKQ
37.1%
VGT
0.4%

Technology

ARKQ
32.6%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKQ
16.9%
VGT
0.1%

Communication Services

ARKQ
8.1%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

ARKQ
2.2%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

ARKQ
1.9%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

ARKQ
1.3%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

ARKQ

-

VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

ARKQ

-

VGT

-

Financial Services

ARKQ

-

VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

ARKQ

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKQVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.57

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

11.41

-0.49

ARKQ vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKQVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.88

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.04

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-54.63%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.58%

-16.40%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-27.23%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

-35.07%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

-35.07%

-24.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-2.35%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-7.95%

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

5.13%

+1.66%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.51%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.40%

6.51%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.44%

16.09%

+8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.48%

20.55%

+11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.22%

25.17%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.83%

24.60%

+5.23%

ARKQ vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and VGT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to VGT (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.62% vs 22.42% for ARKQ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 22.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer