PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGX vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARGX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in argenx SE (ARGX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGX achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return.


ARGX

1D
1.37%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-3.31%
6M
-11.79%
1Y
41.02%
3Y*
27.12%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-3.17%
1M
3.54%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-6.96%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGX
argenx SE
-3.31%36.74%61.66%0.42%8.18%19.08%83.21%67.09%52.15%174.52%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.24%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%27.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGX and MSFT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.27

The correlation between ARGX and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARGX:

$53.83B

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

ARGX:

$32.69

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

ARGX:

24.87

MSFT:

25.45

PEG Ratio

ARGX:

0.48

MSFT:

1.78

PS Ratio

ARGX:

9.76

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

ARGX:

7.35

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARGX:

$5.49B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARGX:

$4.38B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARGX:

$1.50B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGX
ARGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ARGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for argenx SE (ARGX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGXMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.97

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.21

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

-0.44

+4.26

ARGX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGX and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGXMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

-0.28

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.75

+0.21

Drawdowns

ARGX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGX drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGX and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGXMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-69.38%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.58%

-33.91%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.20%

-33.91%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.20%

-37.15%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.53%

-20.67%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-21.78%

+10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.75%

15.95%

-5.20%

Volatility

ARGX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

argenx SE (ARGX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 9.74% and 9.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGXMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

9.95%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.02%

22.34%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.77%

25.12%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

26.63%

+12.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.67%

27.04%

+23.63%

Dividends

ARGX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

ARGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGX
argenx SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

ARGX vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between argenx SE and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202120222023202420252026
2.41B
82.89B
(ARGX) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARGX vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between argenx SE and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
89.3%
67.6%
Portfolio components
ARGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

ARGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported an operating income of 658.56M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

ARGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported a net income of 874.92M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARGX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to ARGX (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGX dropped -38.20% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

ARGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGX and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer