PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGX vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARGX vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in argenx SE (ARGX) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGX achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -19.55% return.


ARGX

1D
-4.06%
1M
2.38%
YTD
-4.61%
6M
-12.37%
1Y
37.22%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
24.67%
10Y*

ARES

1D
-0.36%
1M
7.80%
YTD
-19.55%
6M
-17.77%
1Y
-20.12%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
21.76%
10Y*
29.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGX vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARGX
argenx SE
-4.61%36.74%61.66%0.42%8.18%19.08%83.21%67.09%52.15%174.52%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-19.55%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-5.54%13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGX and ARES is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2017

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between ARGX and ARES has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

ARGX:

$32.69

ARES:

$2.83

PE Ratio

ARGX:

24.54

ARES:

45.31

PEG Ratio

ARGX:

0.47

ARES:

1.81

PS Ratio

ARGX:

9.63

ARES:

4.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARGX:

$5.49B

ARES:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARGX:

$4.38B

ARES:

$4.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARGX:

$1.50B

ARES:

$2.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGX vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGX
ARGX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ARGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGX vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for argenx SE (ARGX) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARGXARESDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

-0.50

+1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

-0.47

+2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.94

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.40

+1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

-0.80

+4.52

ARGX vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGX and ARES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARGXARESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

-0.50

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.64

+0.32

Drawdowns

ARGX vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGX drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum ARES drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGX and ARES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGXARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-49.73%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.58%

-49.05%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.20%

-49.73%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.20%

-49.73%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.71%

-32.26%

+18.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-11.28%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.72%

24.39%

-13.67%

Volatility

ARGX vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

argenx SE (ARGX) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 8.04%. This indicates that ARGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGXARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

8.04%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.05%

34.65%

-13.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.80%

40.35%

-10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

37.17%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.68%

36.61%

+14.07%

Dividends

ARGX vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

ARGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.33%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
ARGX
argenx SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARGX vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between argenx SE and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202120222023202420252026
2.41B
1.53B
(ARGX) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARGX vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between argenx SE and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
89.3%
96.1%
Portfolio components
ARGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

ARGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported an operating income of 658.56M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

ARGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, argenx SE reported a net income of 874.92M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARGX and ARES have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGX has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to ARES (8.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGX dropped -38.20% vs ARES's -49.73%.

ARGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGX and ARES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer