ARGT vs. AAPL
ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) is Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Argentina 25/50, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ARGT returned 17.46%/yr vs 30.12%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARGT vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ARGT has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 17.46%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.
ARGT
- 1D
- -3.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- 26.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 30.12%
ARGT vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 3.65% | 11.51% | 63.46% | 53.64% | 11.80% | 3.83% | 14.58% | 14.50% | -32.62% | 53.87% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 14.34% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARGT and AAPL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARGT and AAPL has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARGT vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
ARGT
AAPL
ARGT vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARGT | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | 2.40 | -2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 3.36 | -2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.43 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 3.88 | -3.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 9.76 | -9.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARGT | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 2.40 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 1.05 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ARGT vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARGT | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -81.80% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.97% | -13.80% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.46% | -33.36% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.14% | -33.36% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | -38.52% | -23.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -1.57% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -29.61% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | 5.47% | +5.73% |
Volatility
ARGT vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that ARGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARGT | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 5.46% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | 15.91% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.70% | 22.32% | +14.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 27.46% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 28.89% | +2.55% |
Dividends
ARGT vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARGT and AAPL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARGT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGT dropped -61.68% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARGT and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer