ARGGY vs. RYCEY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY).

Performance

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARGGY Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc	-40.99%	-35.13%	-54.45%	54.40%	-90.05%	-32.51%	-80.83%	-47.08%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	3.31%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-23.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARGGY : $494.38M RYCEY : $136.46B
EPS ARGGY : -$0.65 RYCEY : $0.99
PS Ratio ARGGY : 0.24 RYCEY : 3.42
PB Ratio ARGGY : 1.57 RYCEY : 50.15
Total Revenue (TTM) ARGGY : $1.84B RYCEY : $40.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARGGY : $355.27M RYCEY : $10.10B
EBITDA (TTM) ARGGY : $313.25M RYCEY : $8.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGGY achieves a -40.99% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 3.31% return.

ARGGY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -18.33%
• YTD: -40.99%
• 6M: -52.88%
• 1Y: -45.56%
• 3Y*: -44.06%
• 5Y*: -55.47%
• 10Y*: —

RYCEY

• 1D: 5.32%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: 3.31%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 61.94%
• 3Y*: 108.63%
• 5Y*: 59.95%
• 10Y*: 6.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARGGY vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGGY

ARGGY Risk / Return Rank: 10
ARGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ARGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ARGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ARGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ARGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARGGY	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	1.67	-2.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	2.23	-3.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.31	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	3.11	-3.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.75	10.76	-12.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGGY and RYCEY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARGGY	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	1.67	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.78	1.41	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.24	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ARGGY and RYCEY is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

ARGGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARGGY Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.84%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Drawdowns

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGGY drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGGY and RYCEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARGGY	RYCEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.83%	-99.07%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.22%	-21.75%	-37.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.48%	-62.01%	-36.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.82%	-79.49%	-20.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.46%	-84.27%	-6.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.26%	6.28%	+19.98%

Volatility

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) has a higher volatility of 22.91% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 17.99%. This indicates that ARGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARGGY	RYCEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.91%	17.99%	+4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.58%	25.74%	+13.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.33%	37.34%	+25.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.51%	42.69%	+28.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.43%	48.92%	+40.51%

Financials

ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ARGGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 21.67M and revenue of 798.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.7%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

ARGGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported an operating income of -67.28M and revenue of 798.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.4%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

ARGGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a net income of -342.28M and revenue of 798.35M, resulting in a net margin of -42.9%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.