ARGGY vs. RYCEY
ARGGY (Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. ARGGY operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ARGGY returned -47.84%/yr vs 62.18%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARGGY achieves a -32.82% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 7.91% return.
ARGGY
- 1D
- -10.03%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- -32.82%
- 6M
- -32.23%
- 1Y
- -48.35%
- 3Y*
- -45.31%
- 5Y*
- -47.84%
- 10Y*
- —
RYCEY
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 110.91%
- 5Y*
- 62.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGGY Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc | -32.82% | -35.13% | -54.45% | 54.40% | -78.99% | -32.51% | -80.83% | -47.08% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 7.91% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARGGY and RYCEY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
ARGGY:
$562.79M
RYCEY:
$141.92B
ARGGY:
-$0.65
RYCEY:
$0.99
ARGGY:
0.28
RYCEY:
3.56
ARGGY:
1.78
RYCEY:
52.15
ARGGY:
$1.84B
RYCEY:
$40.04B
ARGGY:
$355.27M
RYCEY:
$10.10B
ARGGY:
$313.25M
RYCEY:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARGGY vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
ARGGY
RYCEY
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARGGY | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | 1.04 | -1.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | 1.67 | -2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.20 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.80 | -2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 5.14 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARGGY | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.04 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 | 1.44 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.23 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARGGY drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGGY and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARGGY | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.64% | -99.07% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.22% | -21.75% | -37.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.50% | -23.37% | -67.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.80% | -62.01% | -34.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.57% | -78.58% | -20.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.31% | -84.19% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.97% | 7.59% | +25.38% |
Volatility
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) has a higher volatility of 17.15% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 13.12%. This indicates that ARGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARGGY | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.15% | 13.12% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.83% | 32.77% | +6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.08% | 37.76% | +16.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.71% | 43.52% | +23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.80% | 49.34% | +36.46% |
Dividends
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
ARGGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGGY Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 109.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARGGY vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
ARGGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 21.67M and revenue of 798.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.7%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
ARGGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported an operating income of -67.28M and revenue of 798.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.4%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
ARGGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a net income of -342.28M and revenue of 798.35M, resulting in a net margin of -42.9%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARGGY and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARGGY has higher volatility (17.15%) compared to RYCEY (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGGY dropped -99.64% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARGGY and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer