PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARGGY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARGGY achieves a -40.83% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return.


ARGGY

1D
4.53%
1M
-11.53%
6M
-39.35%
YTD
-40.83%
1Y
-51.36%
3Y*
-51.51%
5Y*
-47.26%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.49%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ARGGY
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc
-40.83%-35.13%-54.45%54.40%-78.99%-32.51%-80.83%-47.08%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.05%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ARGGY and ^GSPC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARGGY
ARGGY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ARGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARGGY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.29

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.24

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

9.71

-11.18

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARGGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARGGY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARGGY drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGGY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARGGY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-56.78%

-42.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.27%

-9.10%

-48.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.58%

-18.90%

-71.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.55%

-25.43%

-71.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

-1.00%

-98.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.41%

-10.70%

-79.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.89%

2.09%

+32.80%

Volatility

ARGGY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (ARGGY) has a higher volatility of 15.02% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that ARGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARGGY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.02%

3.25%

+11.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.91%

10.00%

+30.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.13%

12.56%

+40.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.91%

17.00%

+49.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.28%

18.05%

+67.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARGGY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGGY has higher volatility (15.02%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARGGY dropped -99.64% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARGGY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer