AR vs. LNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

Performance

AR vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AR vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AR Antero Resources Corporation	23.16%	-1.68%	54.54%	-26.82%	77.09%	221.10%	91.23%	-69.65%	-50.58%	-19.66%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	46.36%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AR : $13.26B LNG : $60.98B
EPS AR : $2.03 LNG : $24.33
PE Ratio AR : 20.88 LNG : 11.66
PEG Ratio AR : 0.08 LNG : 0.06
PS Ratio AR : 2.55 LNG : 3.11
PB Ratio AR : 1.76 LNG : 7.70
Total Revenue (TTM) AR : $5.20B LNG : $19.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) AR : $1.20B LNG : $5.46B
EBITDA (TTM) AR : $1.75B LNG : $9.75B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 46.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AR has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 5.53%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.28% annualized return.

AR

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 15.29%
• YTD: 23.16%
• 6M: 26.46%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 31.34%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

LNG

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 20.38%
• YTD: 46.36%
• 6M: 21.40%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 32.83%
• 10Y*: 24.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AR vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AR

AR Risk / Return Rank: 44
AR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 66
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AR vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AR	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	0.81	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	1.25	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.17	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	1.19	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	2.72	-2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AR vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AR Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AR and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AR	LNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	0.81	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	1.11	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.74	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.17	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AR and LNG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AR vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AR Antero Resources Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.74%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%

Drawdowns

AR vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AR	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.01%	-97.84%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.77%	-22.34%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.39%	-24.87%	-33.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.78%	-57.53%	-40.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.04%	-4.43%	-32.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.62%	-43.35%	-18.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.19%	9.78%	+10.41%

Volatility

AR vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) have volatilities of 11.06% and 11.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AR	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.06%	11.40%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.73%	18.17%	+11.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.43%	29.59%	+14.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.32%	29.87%	+19.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.77%	32.95%	+27.82%

Financials

AR vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Antero Resources Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 373.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 318.00M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

AR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 193.68M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.