AQN vs. CRSR
AQN (Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp) and CRSR (Corsair Gaming, Inc.) are both stocks. AQN operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while CRSR operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 5 years, AQN returned -12.75%/yr vs -20.81%/yr for CRSR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AQN vs. CRSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQN achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than CRSR's 67.00% return.
AQN
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- -6.69%
- 5Y*
- -12.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.81%
CRSR
- 1D
- -5.30%
- 1M
- 39.33%
- YTD
- 67.00%
- 6M
- 48.06%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- -20.18%
- 5Y*
- -20.81%
- 10Y*
- —
AQN vs. CRSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQN Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp | -2.38% | 44.80% | -25.01% | 2.92% | -51.72% | -8.25% | 20.41% |
CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 67.00% | -10.14% | -53.12% | 3.91% | -35.41% | -41.99% | 154.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQN and CRSR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AQN and CRSR shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AQN:
$4.59B
CRSR:
$1.07B
AQN:
$0.22
CRSR:
$0.04
AQN:
27.18
CRSR:
235.20
AQN:
0.20
CRSR:
0.70
AQN:
1.83
CRSR:
0.73
AQN:
1.02
CRSR:
1.65
AQN:
$2.51B
CRSR:
$1.46B
AQN:
$1.48B
CRSR:
$439.55M
AQN:
$958.41M
CRSR:
$57.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQN vs. CRSR — Risk / Return Rank
AQN
CRSR
AQN vs. CRSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) and Corsair Gaming, Inc. (CRSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQN | CRSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 0.30 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQN | CRSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.11 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | -0.35 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.10 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
AQN vs. CRSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQN drawdown since its inception was -69.73%, smaller than the maximum CRSR drawdown of -91.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQN and CRSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQN | CRSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.73% | -91.07% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -53.07% | +36.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.71% | -76.73% | +31.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.21% | -87.28% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.17% | -80.65% | +25.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -67.03% | +48.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 29.63% | -22.67% |
Volatility
AQN vs. CRSR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) is 6.03%, while Corsair Gaming, Inc. (CRSR) has a volatility of 36.26%. This indicates that AQN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQN | CRSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 36.26% | -30.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.64% | 64.12% | -45.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.48% | 79.40% | -54.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.55% | 59.15% | -28.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 61.46% | -33.49% |
Dividends
AQN vs. CRSR - Dividend Comparison
AQN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, while CRSR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQN Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp | 4.38% | 4.23% | 7.80% | 6.87% | 10.94% | 4.62% | 3.68% | 3.90% | 4.99% | 4.18% | 4.88% | 4.77% |
CRSR Corsair Gaming, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AQN vs. CRSR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp and Corsair Gaming, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AQN vs. CRSR - Profitability Comparison
AQN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported a gross profit of 170.41M and revenue of 773.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
CRSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.03M and revenue of 354.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
AQN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported an operating income of 170.41M and revenue of 773.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.
CRSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.80M and revenue of 354.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
AQN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported a net income of 85.01M and revenue of 773.53M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
CRSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corsair Gaming, Inc. reported a net income of 11.86M and revenue of 354.51M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AQN and CRSR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSR has higher volatility (36.26%) compared to AQN (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQN dropped -69.73% vs CRSR's -91.07%.
AQN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AQN and CRSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer