PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQN vs. CNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AQN vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQN achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 42.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AQN has underperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 0.81%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.07% annualized return.


AQN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
3.71%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
-6.69%
5Y*
-12.75%
10Y*
0.81%

CNQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
42.08%
6M
41.38%
1Y
61.82%
3Y*
25.66%
5Y*
27.14%
10Y*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQN vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQN
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp
-2.38%44.80%-25.01%2.92%-51.72%-8.25%21.54%46.99%-5.28%37.60%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
42.08%15.58%-1.31%23.72%42.82%83.55%-19.06%39.72%-29.92%15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AQN and CNQ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009

0.26

The correlation between AQN and CNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AQN:

$4.59B

CNQ:

$99.90B

EPS

AQN:

$0.22

CNQ:

$4.65

PE Ratio

AQN:

27.18

CNQ:

10.25

PEG Ratio

AQN:

0.20

CNQ:

0.49

PS Ratio

AQN:

1.83

CNQ:

2.44

PB Ratio

AQN:

1.02

CNQ:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

AQN:

$2.51B

CNQ:

$40.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AQN:

$1.48B

CNQ:

$12.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

AQN:

$958.41M

CNQ:

$22.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQN vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQN
AQN Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AQN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AQN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQN Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ
CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQN vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQNCNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

4.39

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

10.10

-9.39

AQN vs. CNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQN Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQN and CNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQNCNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

2.17

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.83

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.45

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Drawdowns

AQN vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQN drawdown since its inception was -69.73%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQN and CNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQNCNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.73%

-80.75%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-14.16%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.71%

-35.85%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.21%

-35.85%

-32.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.73%

-77.84%

+8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.17%

-4.86%

-50.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-23.53%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

6.14%

+0.82%

Volatility

AQN vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) is 6.03%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that AQN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQNCNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

9.25%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

23.51%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.48%

28.67%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

32.78%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.97%

40.26%

-12.29%

Dividends

AQN vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

AQN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than CNQ's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQN
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp
4.38%4.23%7.80%6.87%10.94%4.62%3.68%3.90%4.99%4.18%4.88%4.77%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.65%5.01%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.78%5.26%3.49%4.56%3.08%2.94%4.21%

Financials

AQN vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
773.53M
10.84B
(AQN) Total Revenue
(CNQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AQN vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
22.0%
32.1%
Portfolio components
AQN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported a gross profit of 170.41M and revenue of 773.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

AQN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported an operating income of 170.41M and revenue of 773.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

AQN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp reported a net income of 85.01M and revenue of 773.53M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AQN and CNQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNQ has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to AQN (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQN dropped -69.73% vs CNQ's -80.75%.

CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQN and CNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer