PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
APPLX vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between APPLX and BTU is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

APPLX vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Appleseed Fund (APPLX) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
34.01%
-29.41%
APPLX
BTU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

APPLX:

0.89

BTU:

-0.67

Sortino Ratio

APPLX:

1.25

BTU:

-0.83

Omega Ratio

APPLX:

1.16

BTU:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

APPLX:

0.51

BTU:

-0.42

Martin Ratio

APPLX:

4.12

BTU:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

APPLX:

2.57%

BTU:

16.86%

Daily Std Dev

APPLX:

11.94%

BTU:

35.95%

Max Drawdown

APPLX:

-47.08%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

APPLX:

-10.46%

BTU:

-54.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APPLX achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -7.59% return.


APPLX

YTD

4.32%

1M

4.47%

6M

3.41%

1Y

10.40%

5Y*

4.10%

10Y*

3.29%

BTU

YTD

-7.59%

1M

-2.32%

6M

-12.42%

1Y

-27.55%

5Y*

21.62%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

APPLX vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APPLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APPLX is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APPLX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APPLX is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APPLX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APPLX is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APPLX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

APPLX vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Appleseed Fund (APPLX) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for APPLX, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.89-0.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for APPLX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.25-0.83
The chart of Omega ratio for APPLX, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.160.91
The chart of Calmar ratio for APPLX, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.51-0.42
The chart of Martin ratio for APPLX, currently valued at 4.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.12-1.43
APPLX
BTU

The current APPLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APPLX and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.89
-0.67
APPLX
BTU

Dividends

APPLX vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

APPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than BTU's 1.55% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
APPLX
Appleseed Fund
5.21%5.44%1.96%0.00%1.02%1.46%2.68%0.07%0.63%1.47%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.55%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APPLX vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APPLX drawdown since its inception was -47.08%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPLX and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-10.46%
-54.14%
APPLX
BTU

Volatility

APPLX vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Appleseed Fund (APPLX) is 2.08%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that APPLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.08%
11.76%
APPLX
BTU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab