APPF vs. KD
APPF (AppFolio, Inc.) and KD (Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — APPF in Software - Application, KD in Information Technology Services. Over the past 3 years, APPF returned 1.32%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for KD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APPF vs. KD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APPF achieves a -28.53% return, which is significantly higher than KD's -53.77% return.
APPF
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -28.53%
- 6M
- -29.67%
- 1Y
- -23.78%
- 3Y*
- 1.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 27.54%
KD
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -14.66%
- YTD
- -53.77%
- 6M
- -53.31%
- 1Y
- -69.08%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APPF vs. KD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APPF AppFolio, Inc. | -28.53% | -5.70% | 42.42% | 64.40% | -12.95% | -8.95% |
KD Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. | -53.77% | -23.24% | 66.51% | 86.87% | -38.56% | -55.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between APPF and KD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
APPF:
$5.95B
KD:
$2.80B
APPF:
$4.21
KD:
$0.84
APPF:
39.52
KD:
14.55
APPF:
6.03
KD:
0.19
APPF:
$995.33M
KD:
$15.09B
APPF:
$629.41M
KD:
$2.44B
APPF:
$197.89M
KD:
$2.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APPF vs. KD — Risk / Return Rank
APPF
KD
APPF vs. KD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) and Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APPF | KD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.75 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.92 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | -1.45 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APPF | KD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | -0.95 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.39 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
APPF vs. KD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APPF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum KD drawdown of -79.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPF and KD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APPF | KD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -79.80% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.38% | -75.60% | +20.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.38% | -75.63% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.24% | -71.74% | +23.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -50.27% | +31.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.57% | 47.63% | -15.06% |
Volatility
APPF vs. KD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) is 15.63%, while Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that APPF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APPF | KD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.63% | 16.92% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.00% | 87.87% | -56.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.27% | 72.85% | -29.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.17% | 58.57% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 58.57% | -14.34% |
Dividends
APPF vs. KD - Dividend Comparison
Neither APPF nor KD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
APPF vs. KD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AppFolio, Inc. and Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APPF vs. KD - Profitability Comparison
APPF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a gross profit of 167.24M and revenue of 262.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
KD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APPF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.75M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
KD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
APPF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
KD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APPF and KD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KD has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to APPF (15.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPF dropped -55.38% vs KD's -79.80%.
APPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APPF and KD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer