PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APPF vs. FWONK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APPF vs. FWONK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) and Formula One Group (FWONK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APPF achieves a -28.53% return, which is significantly lower than FWONK's -11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, APPF has outperformed FWONK with an annualized return of 27.54%, while FWONK has yielded a comparatively lower 16.25% annualized return.


APPF

1D
-4.79%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-28.53%
6M
-29.67%
1Y
-23.78%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
27.54%

FWONK

1D
-2.73%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-11.81%
6M
-5.86%
1Y
-9.94%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APPF vs. FWONK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APPF
AppFolio, Inc.
-28.53%-5.70%42.42%64.40%-12.95%-32.76%63.75%85.66%42.70%74.00%
FWONK
Formula One Group
-11.81%6.31%46.78%7.40%-5.47%48.45%-7.32%49.72%-10.13%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between APPF and FWONK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.26

The correlation between APPF and FWONK shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

APPF:

$4.21

FWONK:

$3.23

PE Ratio

APPF:

39.52

FWONK:

26.91

PEG Ratio

APPF:

0.02

FWONK:

0.47

PS Ratio

APPF:

6.03

FWONK:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

APPF:

$995.33M

FWONK:

$4.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APPF:

$629.41M

FWONK:

$1.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

APPF:

$197.89M

FWONK:

$1.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APPF vs. FWONK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APPF
APPF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
APPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
APPF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
APPF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FWONK
FWONK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FWONK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWONK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWONK Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FWONK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWONK Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APPF vs. FWONK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) and Formula One Group (FWONK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APPFFWONKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.95

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.40

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

-0.75

+0.01

APPF vs. FWONK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APPF Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the FWONK Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APPF and FWONK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APPFFWONKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

-0.41

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.56

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.24

+0.33

Drawdowns

APPF vs. FWONK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APPF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FWONK drawdown of -57.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APPF and FWONK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPFFWONKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-57.74%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.38%

-24.84%

-30.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.38%

-24.84%

-30.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.38%

-24.84%

-30.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.38%

-57.74%

+2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.24%

-19.80%

-28.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-12.65%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.57%

13.35%

+19.22%

Volatility

APPF vs. FWONK - Volatility Comparison

AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) has a higher volatility of 15.63% compared to Formula One Group (FWONK) at 8.93%. This indicates that APPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWONK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPFFWONKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.63%

8.93%

+6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.00%

18.82%

+12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.27%

24.13%

+19.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.17%

26.92%

+16.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

32.89%

+11.34%

Dividends

APPF vs. FWONK - Dividend Comparison

Neither APPF nor FWONK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

APPF vs. FWONK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AppFolio, Inc. and Formula One Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
262.21M
711.00M
(APPF) Total Revenue
(FWONK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APPF vs. FWONK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AppFolio, Inc. and Formula One Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
63.8%
41.9%
Portfolio components
APPF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a gross profit of 167.24M and revenue of 262.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

FWONK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Formula One Group reported a gross profit of 298.00M and revenue of 711.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

APPF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.75M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

FWONK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Formula One Group reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

APPF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppFolio, Inc. reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 262.21M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

FWONK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Formula One Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APPF and FWONK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APPF has higher volatility (15.63%) compared to FWONK (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APPF dropped -55.38% vs FWONK's -57.74%.

FWONK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APPF and FWONK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer