PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLY vs. YMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APLY vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than YMAG's 4.70% return.


APLY

1D
2.35%
1M
9.01%
YTD
10.44%
6M
6.60%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
10Y*

YMAG

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.88%
YTD
4.70%
6M
5.20%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLY vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
10.44%4.69%21.54%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
4.70%18.64%36.05%

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and YMAG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLY vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLY vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APLYYMAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.75

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.36

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.00

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

7.06

+1.40

APLY vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLYYMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.75

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.21

-0.51

Drawdowns

APLY vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and YMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLYYMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-25.96%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-14.38%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.86%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-4.53%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

4.08%

+0.52%

Volatility

APLY vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 3.54%. This indicates that APLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLYYMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.54%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

11.48%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

16.16%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

20.89%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

20.89%

+0.08%

APLY vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

APLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

APLY vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.43%, less than YMAG's 50.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
34.43%36.38%24.95%14.36%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
50.37%52.27%35.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APLY and YMAG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLY has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to YMAG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLY dropped -30.41% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 38.48% vs 28.12% for YMAG. On fees, APLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 38.48% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 50.37%, compared with 34.43% for APLY.

APLY is categorized as Options Trading, while YMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for APLY and 1.28% for YMAG.

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLY and YMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer