PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
APLY vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between APLY and NVDA is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

APLY vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.55%
14.89%
APLY
NVDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

APLY:

0.52

NVDA:

2.77

Sortino Ratio

APLY:

0.79

NVDA:

3.17

Omega Ratio

APLY:

1.11

NVDA:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

APLY:

0.63

NVDA:

5.42

Martin Ratio

APLY:

2.10

NVDA:

16.33

Ulcer Index

APLY:

4.26%

NVDA:

8.98%

Daily Std Dev

APLY:

17.25%

NVDA:

52.98%

Max Drawdown

APLY:

-15.86%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

APLY:

-12.50%

NVDA:

-5.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLY achieves a -10.27% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 4.87% return.


APLY

YTD

-10.27%

1M

-11.50%

6M

-1.55%

1Y

7.44%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NVDA

YTD

4.87%

1M

4.55%

6M

14.90%

1Y

136.13%

5Y*

86.64%

10Y*

76.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

APLY vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APLY is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APLY is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APLY is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APLY is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APLY is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APLY is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

APLY vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for APLY, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.522.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for APLY, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.793.17
The chart of Omega ratio for APLY, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.111.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for APLY, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.635.42
The chart of Martin ratio for APLY, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.1016.33
APLY
NVDA

The current APLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLY and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.52
2.77
APLY
NVDA

Dividends

APLY vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.53%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
26.53%24.95%14.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

APLY vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLY drawdown since its inception was -15.86%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLY and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-12.50%
-5.76%
APLY
NVDA

Volatility

APLY vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) is 6.47%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that APLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.47%
12.84%
APLY
NVDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab