APLD vs. LAES

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES).

Performance

APLD vs. LAES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APLD vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APLD Applied Digital Corporation	-0.12%	220.94%	13.35%	-25.85%
LAES SEALSQ Corp	-33.60%	-38.54%	380.47%	-94.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap APLD : $6.53B LAES : $292.36M
EPS APLD : -$0.51 LAES : -$0.43
PS Ratio APLD : 20.97 LAES : 8.27
PB Ratio APLD : 4.50 LAES : 2.47
Total Revenue (TTM) APLD : $281.74M LAES : $35.37M
Gross Profit (TTM) APLD : $46.19M LAES : $13.21M
EBITDA (TTM) APLD : -$49.02M LAES : -$41.81M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -33.60% return.

APLD

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: -2.04%
• 1Y: 302.13%
• 3Y*: 121.95%
• 5Y*: 77.76%
• 10Y*: 76.46%

LAES

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: -37.41%
• YTD: -33.60%
• 6M: -37.09%
• 1Y: -8.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APLD vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLD

APLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LAES

LAES Risk / Return Rank: 41
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLD vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APLD	LAES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	-0.07	+2.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	0.76	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.08	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.67	-0.05	+6.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.30	-0.10	+15.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APLD vs. LAES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the LAES Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and LAES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APLD	LAES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	-0.07	+2.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	-0.31	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and LAES is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

APLD vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLD nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

APLD vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and LAES.

Drawdown Indicators

	APLD	LAES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.70%	-98.44%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.31%	-69.80%	+19.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.77%	-88.58%	+47.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.02%	-84.58%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.94%	34.21%	-12.27%

Volatility

APLD vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 31.91% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 28.27%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APLD	LAES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.91%	28.27%	+3.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.80%	84.59%	-6.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	126.26%	110.72%	+15.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.86%	173.62%	+14.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	295.74%	173.62%	+122.12%

Financials